Moving a charge/electrostatic force

  • Thread starter Thread starter ajmCane22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by the electrostatic force on a moving point charge in relation to a stationary charge. The key formula involves the change in electric potential energy, expressed as W = Uf - Ui = delta U, and incorporates Coulomb's constant. Participants emphasize the importance of using variables instead of numerical values for a general solution. Clarification is provided regarding the correct relationship between electrostatic potential and electric potential energy. Ultimately, a numeric answer cannot be derived without specific values for the charges and distances involved.
ajmCane22
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A point charge with charge q1 is held stationary at the origin. A second point charge with charge q2 moves from the point (x1,0) to the point (x2,y2).

How much work is done by the electrostatic force on the moving point charge?

Express your answer in joules. Use k for Coulomb's constant (k = 1/4*pi*epsilon.

Homework Equations



W = Uf-Ui = delta U
k q1*q2/[(1/r2 - 1/r1]

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to attempt when there are no q values and no r values. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ajmCane22,

Have you worked through the problem using the variables that you were given? It may seem unnatural at first, but using variables instead of numerical values is good practice, especially for checking your work later on. This exercise appears to help you realize that.

Also, your second relevant equation is not quite right. It might help to remember what the relation between the electrostatic potential and electric potential energy is.
 
You will have q1, q2, x2 and y2 in your final answer.
You cannot get a numeric answer without knowing the numbers for those variables.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top