Moving Proton in an Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
A proton with a kinetic energy of 4.95 × 10^6 eV is analyzed when fired perpendicular to a charged plate with a charge density of +8.10 μC/m². The force on the proton can be calculated using Gauss's law, yielding a formula of qσ/(2ε) for the electric field. To bring the proton to rest, the work done by the electric field must equal the initial kinetic energy, which can be expressed as q*V, where V is the potential difference. It's clarified that voltage is measured in volts, while eV is a unit of energy, and the confusion arises from mixing these concepts. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Fred91
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1.
A) A proton with kinetic energy of 4.95 × 106 eV is fired perpendicular to the face of a large plate that has a uniform charge density of σ = +8.10 μC/m2. What is the magnitude of the force on the proton?

B) How much work must the electric field do on the proton to bring it to rest?




2.
E = σ/epsilon
V=K*q/r
F= E*q
V= -E*r
W=q*v




When I started making this thread I didn't understand how to do any of this, then while putting everything together I figured out how to do all of it, but I still have questions about the concepts. Particularly part B. I mostly understand part A.

3.

Part A) Since an elementary charge is 1.6*10^-19 I used this charge to figure out the magnitude of the force. Apparently somehow guass's law comes into play for part A making the formula needed become qσ/(2epsilon) If someone could explain to me why this is so I would appreciate it, when I did it without looking seeking help I only made the equation qσ/(epsilon).

Part B) I'm very confused about this method. I thought maybe if I took eV/q that would give me delta(V) which = delta(U)/q so eV=work, but apparently you can use work = q*voltage where the voltage is *already* measured in eV? If someone could explain to me I would appreciate it since the formula isn't in my book and I can't seem to find anywhere to derive it. Closest I can find is delta(v)=delta(U)/q where U is the Electric potential difference. This is the part of this problem I need explained. My book says q*delta(V) gives you eV. But yet to get the answer for this problem I did q*V, where V= 4.95*10^6eV and q = eV measured as 1.6*10^-19 J


So essentially I multiplied the energy given in eV by eV to get the work (which my book leads me to believe is actually how you change a value into eV)? Maybe I'm misunderstanding my book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fred91 said:
Part A) Since an elementary charge is 1.6*10^-19 I used this charge to figure out the magnitude of the force. Apparently somehow guass's law comes into play for part A making the formula needed become qσ/(2epsilon) If someone could explain to me why this is so I would appreciate it, when I did it without looking seeking help I only made the equation qσ/(epsilon).
Post your reasoning for your Gauss' Law derivation for the electric field near the plate.

Part B) I'm very confused about this method. I thought maybe if I took eV/q that would give me delta(V) which = delta(U)/q so eV=work, but apparently you can use work = q*voltage where the voltage is *already* measured in eV? If someone could explain to me I would appreciate it since the formula isn't in my book and I can't seem to find anywhere to derive it. Closest I can find is delta(v)=delta(U)/q where U is the Electric potential difference. This is the part of this problem I need explained. My book says q*delta(V) gives you eV. But yet to get the answer for this problem I did q*V, where V= 4.95*10^6eV and q = eV measured as 1.6*10^-19 J


So essentially I multiplied the energy given in eV by eV to get the work (which my book leads me to believe is actually how you change a value into eV)? Maybe I'm misunderstanding my book.

Voltage is not measured in eV. Voltage is measured in, well, Volts, which in turn can be expressed as Joules per Coulomb.

The eV is a unit of energy. It's the KE that would result from an electron (with unit fundamental charge 1.6*10^-19 Coulombs) falling through a potential difference of 1 volt (1 Joule per Coulomb). So you end up with the eV being 1.6*10^-19 Joules.

So when the problem gives you the kinetic energy of the proton in eV, it's not giving you a voltage but rather the energy in convenient units. The eV units are convenient for these types of problems because it immediately tells you what size of potential difference (volts) the unit charge must fall through in order to achieve a change in energy of the same size.

The electric potential difference in a uniform electric field (like the plate is providing) is simply the field magnitude multiplied by the change in distance parallel to the field lines.

In order to bring to rest a body with kinetic energy KE, an amount of work equal to that KE must be done on the body. You're given the KE of the proton in eV units...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top