Multichannel Square Tube Hydraulic Diameter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the hydraulic diameter for a rectangular tube with multiple inner channels. The user is uncertain whether to sum the hydraulic diameters of each channel or to neglect the inner walls and calculate for the entire tube. Responses indicate that both methods are flawed; summing the diameters leads to an inflated value, while neglecting the walls ignores frictional pressure drops. The recommended approach is to treat each channel as an independent flow path to accurately determine the hydraulic diameter. This method ensures a more precise calculation considering the effects of the inner walls.
chupacabras
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am new to this forum.

I read the thread about the water flow in a rectangular tube because I wanted to correlate what was being said into my own problem.

My question I believe is very simple:

I have a rectangular tube that has inner dividers, let's say that my tube has 6 channels inside that are 7.15mm L X 3.54mm W, plus a 7th channel 7.15mm L X 5mm W.

Lets's say also that if I neglect the inner walls, the result is a bigger rectangle, roughly 29.3mm L x 7.15mm W.

I need to come up with the Hydraulic Diameter for the whole tube.

What is the approach I should take:

a) should I add the seven Hydraulic Diameters for each inner tube?

b) should I neglect the inner walls and calculate for the whole tube?

When I add up each channel's HDs, the results is 3 times higher than when I calculate for the whole tube, neglecting the inner walls.


I would really like your input on this subject, and I am sorry if this is so simple I had overlooked the answer.

Thanks,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi chup
a) should I add the seven Hydraulic Diameters for each inner tube?
That won't work, you'll get an enormous equivalent pipe diameter.

b) should I neglect the inner walls and calculate for the whole tube?
That won't work either. The inner walls create frictional pressure drop that you'd be neglecting.

The only way I know of to do this is to treat all seven diameters as independant flow paths.
 
Q_Goest: Thank you, that seems to be the most logical approach.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top