[Multiple Choice] wavelength of an object. de Broglie wavelength

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around determining which object has the largest de Broglie wavelength among a quick-moving bee, an electron, a slowly lumbering elephant, and the Earth orbiting the sun. Participants analyze the relationship between mass, velocity, and wavelength, using the formula λ = h/mv. It is concluded that the electron, having the smallest mass, results in the largest wavelength compared to the other options. Calculations show that the electron's wavelength is significantly larger than those of the bee, elephant, and Earth. Ultimately, the consensus is that the electron orbiting a nucleus has the largest wavelength.
daNAV1GATOR
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] [Multiple Choice] ...wavelength of an object. de Broglie wavelength

1. THE PROBLEM STATEMENT

MULTIPLE CHOICE
Which of the following would you expect to have the largest wavelength associated with it?

(A) a quick-moving bee
(B) an electron orbiting a nucleus
(C) a slowly lumbering elephant
(D) the Earth orbiting the sun
2. RELEVANT EQUATIONS

The wavelength of a particle is called the de Broglie wavelength.

wavelength = \frac{h}{momentum}

h = Planck's constant
3. THE ATTEMPT AT A SOLUTION

My thoughts...

(A) A quick moving bee... its wings are flapping at high frequency. that would mean it has a short wavelength. But I don't think the wings is involved in the question. hehe =)

(B) electron... smaller than the wavelength of light but is still detectable. In fact, my textbook shows that its wavelength (traveling at 2% of the speed of light) is larger than a ball bearing a mass of 0.02 kg traveling at 330 m/s.

(C) elephant... my textbook says that "a particle of LARGE MASS and ordinary speed has too small a wavelength to be detected by conventional means."

(D) earth... well, it's also a large mass. But it does travel at a blazing speed.Is the answer (A) Electron?
'cuz a bee travels much slower than the electron... hmm...
Please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say electron.
p = mv

electron max v can be 3E8
bee min v can be 1

electron max is .. E-27?
bee mass is ~ E-3 or 4
 
Why not try putting some figures in?
 
cristo said:
Why not try putting some figures in?

Good point...

should I just make estimates? The question doesn't give any figures.
 
rootX said:
I would say electron.
p = mv

electron max v can be 3E8
bee min v can be 1

electron max is .. E-27?
bee mass is ~ E-3 or 4
Can you translate please? hehehe :confused::smile:
I don't understand "3E8" ... "E-27"...
 
Last edited:
cristo said:
Why not try putting some figures in?

Do you think I should? It's just supposed to be a simple problem... 'What would I expect'...


But since I don't know what to expect... oh well. Fine, I'll put some figures in. :frown:
 
1E8 = 1*10^8

don't need exact numbers
say actual bee mass is 257 g
you can use 1*10^-3 g or even 1*10^-4 g..

you should know electron mass (u will be using it a lot in physics ...)
and you must know that nothing can exceed speed of light: 3e8
 
Ahhh... okay. E for EXPONENT. duh!

so it's 10^{8}
 
Well if I was faced with this question I would have to say the electron.
Why?
Well


\lambda=\frac{h}{mv}


firstly (even though this is wrong to do) assume all move with the same velocity.
That would make \lambda \propto \frac{1}{m}

so the one with the least mass would have the biggest wavelength...the electron has the smallest and hence the largest of them all.
 
  • #10
daNAV1GATOR said:
But since I don't know what to expect... oh well. Fine, I'll put some figures in. :frown:

Yea, just pick some numbers; it's better than just guessing! So, for an elephant, say, it has a speed of about 3m/s, mass of 1000kg, thus a momentum of 3000kgm/s. Plug this in your formula. Do the same for the other cases.
 
  • #11
Okay... the answer does seem to be (B), Electron orbiting a nucleus.

Quick moving bee = 2 x 10^{-31} m
(0.0005 kg, 6.7 m/s)

Electron = 10^{-10} m

Elephant = 10^{-37} m
(3000 kg, 2 m/s)

Earth = 10^{-39} m
(6 x 10^{24} kg, 30,000 m/s)


T H A N K S . G U Y S ! ! !
i'M nOw dOnE wItH mY PhYsICs... pretty fun. learned a lot.
 
  • #12


ok,
we know another formula that
f=v/\lambda.
(as, \upsilon=c/\lambda)

so,
using velocity also you can solve it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top