Multiplying by 1 adds a restriction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tahayassen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Multiplying by 1 in algebra can introduce restrictions when the expression used to represent 1, such as (a+b)/(a+b), is not defined for certain values, specifically when a+b=0. This identification creates a limitation that does not exist when simply multiplying by 1. While techniques like multiplying by the conjugate are common to simplify expressions, they similarly rely on avoiding the special case where a+b equals zero. In general, cases where a+b=0 are often considered uninteresting and can be treated separately. The key takeaway is that while multiplying by 1 is valid, the specific form used can lead to restrictions that must be acknowledged.
tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1
(a-b)=(a-b)*1\\ =(a-b)\frac { a+b }{ a+b } \\ =\frac { { a }^{ 2 }-{ b }^{ 2 } }{ a+b }

But now we have the restriction that a+b≠0?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is the identification of 1=(a+b)/(a+b) that introduces that restriction, not multiplying with 1 as such.
 
arildno said:
It is the identification of 1=(a+b)/(a+b) that introduces that restriction, not multiplying with 1 as such.

So how come we do that all the time in algebra (multiplying by the conjugate) to get rid of annoying radicals? Doesn't that make it not equal to the previous line?
 
tahayassen said:
So how come we do that all the time with binomial conjugates? Doesn't that make it not equal to the previous line?

Basically because the case a+b=0 can usually be treated as an uninteresting special case.
 
You can always multiply by 1 to get a new expression with the same value. The problem here is that what you multiplied by [ (a + b)/(a + b) ] isn't identically 1, and it is those values of a and b that cause a problem.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top