Multivariable chain rule proof

mrcheeses
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Take a constant p ≥ 1 and f(x, y) a function of two variables with continuous
first order partial derivatives. If, f(λx, λy) = (γ^p)f(x,y) for λ ε ℝ, prove that

x(∂f/∂x) + y(∂f/∂y) = pf

Homework Equations



x(∂f/∂x) + y(∂f/∂y) = pf
f(λx, λy) = (λ^p)f(x,y)

The Attempt at a Solution



I just don't know how to start. I know you have to use multivariable chain rule. Can someone point me in the right direction?

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mrcheeses said:

Homework Statement



Take a constant p  ≥ 1 and f(x, y) a function of two variables with continuous
first order partial derivatives. If, f(λx, λy) = (γ^p)f(x,y) for λ ε ℝ, prove that

x(∂f/∂x) + y(∂f/∂y) = pf

Homework Equations



x(∂f/∂x) + y(∂f/∂y) = pf
f(λx, λy) = (γ^p)f(x,y)


The Attempt at a Solution



I just don't know how to start. I know you have to use multivariable chain rule. Can someone point me in the right direction?

Take the derivative of both sides of your defining relation with respect to λ. Then put λ=1.
 
how would you differentiate with respect to lambda?

Also made a mistake.

Its: f(λx, λy) = (λ^p)f(x,y)
 
mrcheeses said:
how would you differentiate with respect to lambda?

Also made a mistake.

Its: f(λx, λy) = (λ^p)f(x,y)

Put x'=λx and y'=λy, so f(λx, λy)=f(x',y'). Apply the multivariable chain rule to find ∂f(x',y')/∂λ. Then differentiate the other side with respect to λ as well.
 
why do you put x prime=λx and y prime=λy?
 
mrcheeses said:
why do you put x prime=λx and y prime=λy?

Just apply the multivariable chain rule to ∂f(x',y')/∂λ. You'll see.
 
What about the right side? Is p * lamdba^(p-1) f(x,y) correct?
 
mrcheeses said:
What about the right side? Is p * lamdba^(p-1) f(x,y) correct?

Yes, now do the left side, that's the chain rule part. Remember in the end you are going to put λ=1.
 
But lamda is an element of all real numbers right? So how can you prove this if we only choose lambda as 1?
 
  • #10
I got ∂f/∂x'*x + ∂f/∂y' *y on the left side. What do we do after that?
 
  • #11
mrcheeses said:
But lamda is an element of all real numbers right? So how can you prove this if we only choose lambda as 1?

You can get a more complicated relation that's true for general λ. But the specific result they want you to prove doesn't have a λ in it. That's why I suggest putting λ=1 after you do the differentiations.
 
  • #12
mrcheeses said:
I got ∂f/∂x'*x + ∂f/∂y' *y on the left side. What do we do after that?

Convince yourself that e.g. ∂f(x',y')/∂x'=∂f(x,y)/∂x=∂f/∂x when λ=1.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #13
Got it, thanks!
 
Back
Top