Muonic hydrogen, change in potential of the muon.

L-x
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Taking the proton to be a uniformly charged sphere of radius 1 fm, find an
expression for the change in potential experienced by the muon as compared with that
in the case of a point-like proton. Use first order perturbation theory to calculate the
ground-state energy shift in muonic hydrogen



Homework Equations



E=-grad(V)

The Attempt at a Solution



The electric field due to a uniformly charged sphere is exactly the same as the field due to a point charge of the region outside the sphere (by a simple application of gauss's law). For this reason I see no need for the potential to change. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you say is true - the potential outside of the proton is unchanged. However, the potential inside the proton is different in the two cases. Since the wave function at the origin is non-zero, there is some finite probability for the muon to be found inside the proton. So you can take the standard 1S solution as the unperturbed state, and apply a perturbation which is a difference between the potential of a point charge and the potential of a sphere. The perturbation is only non-zero inside the proton.
 
Thanks. That makes sense.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top