Muscles opperating with efficiency of 18%

  • Thread starter Thread starter omc1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency
AI Thread Summary
Muscles operate at an efficiency of 18% when converting stored chemical energy into work. For a person weighing 63.6 kg ascending to a height of 21.0 m, the potential energy gained is calculated to be approximately 13088.88 J. To determine the required chemical energy, the efficiency must be considered; thus, to achieve this potential energy, about 72716 J of chemical energy is necessary. The calculations confirm that the 18% efficiency is crucial for determining the total energy expenditure. Understanding this efficiency is essential for solving similar problems related to energy conversion in muscular activity.
omc1
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Muscles operate with an efficiency of about 18.0 percent in converting stored chemical energy into work. How much chemical energy will be expended by a 63.6 kg person in the process of ascending several flights of stairs to a height of 21.0m?

Homework Equations

pe= mgh(initial)



The Attempt at a Solution

pe=13088.88 J i wasnt sure if the 18% had anything to do with the problem or not
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 18% are relevant.

13088.88 J is the potential energy the person gains. However, the question asks for the chemical energy.

Muscles can convert this chemical energy into work with 18% efficiency - if you expend 100 J of chemical energy, you can gain 18 J of potential energy (at least according to this problem). How much chemical energy to you need to gain 13088.88 J of potential energy?
 
i think 2355.10??
 
no wait i got 72716 J...i think that's right then
 
yup that works thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top