Mutual Inductance for a Pair of Coils

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mutual inductance of two coils, Coil A with 400 turns and a radius of 91.0 cm, and Coil B with 160 turns and a radius of 2.0 cm, positioned 92.0 cm apart. The user attempted to find the mutual inductance using the formula N1N2πR2²/2R1 but reported incorrect results. Another participant suggested calculating the magnetic field at the location of Coil B due to Coil A and then determining the flux to find the inductance. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying the principles of mutual inductance and magnetic flux. Clarification on the calculations and methodology is sought to resolve the discrepancies in the results.
mjk71
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[URL]http://nplq1.phyast.pitt.edu/res/csm/csmphyslib/type66_inductance/PairOfCoils.jpg[/URL]
Coil A is a large 400 turn circular coil of radius 91.0 cm. Circular coil B has 160 turns, a radius of 2.0 cm and is located L = 92.0 cm from coil A along the same axis. The planes of the two coils are parallel. 1.) Find approximately the mutual inductance of this pair of coils. 2.) If the current in coil A varies with time according to I = 14t3 - 59t2 - 1, where I is in amps and t is in s, find the magnitude of the EMF induced in coil B at time t = 1.0 s.

N1 = 400 turns
N2 = 160 turns
R1 = .02 m
R2 = .91 m
L = .92 m
t = 1.0 s
I(t) = 14t3 - 59t2 - 1


Homework Equations


\epsilonL = N1N2\PiR22/2R1 * di(t)/dt


The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to solve for mutual inductance by: N1N2*pi*R22/2R1
And then multiplied by the derivative of I(t) at t=1.0s for the induced emf, but I'm not getting the correct answer. Any help or direction would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mjk71 :smile:

Welcome to PF !

Was the mutual inductance you got correct?
 
Unfortunately, no.
 
Its really late here ... I'll answer your question in morning ..:zzz:
 
Hi mjk71 :smile:

The situation is somethinglike this

attachment.php?attachmentid=33481&stc=1&d=1300981359.png


let there be a current i in bigger loop. find the field on axis of bigger loop at the distance where smaller loop is placed

find flux and then divide it by i
you'll get inductance M
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 1,200
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top