Mw 7.1 offshr SE Mindanao, Philippines

  • Thread starter Thread starter davenn
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A magnitude 7.1 earthquake struck offshore southeast Mindanao, Philippines, at a depth of 65.6 km, with no significant damage reported and no tsunami warning issued. While it is generally unusual for a quake of this magnitude to generate a tsunami, it can occur under specific conditions, such as secondary effects like underwater landslides. Historical examples, such as the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake and the 1998 Papua New Guinea tsunami, illustrate that tsunamis can be triggered by landslides rather than directly from seismic activity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding tsunami hazards and preparedness, particularly in regions not traditionally considered at risk.
davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
11,456
Mw 7.1 offshore SE Mindanao, Philippines, this morning

M 7.1 - 63 km E of Pondaguitan, Philippines
2021-08-11 17:46:14 (UTC)
6.455°N 126.742°E
65.6 km depth

from my seismo
210811 UT Mw7.1 offshr SE Mindanao zhi.gif
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
berkeman said:
Tsunami warning, thank goodness.

Yes, fortunately. Would be unusual for a M7.1 to generate a tsunami, but it does happen.
It's usually because of a secondary effect of the quake ... above or undersea landslide or similar

Dave
 
davenn said:
Would be unusual for a M7.1 to generate a tsunami, but it does happen.
Under the right conditions, including depth and location. For example,
2018 Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Sulawesi_earthquake_and_tsunami

The magnitude 7.5 quake (depth 39.0 km (24.2 mi)) was located 70 km (43 mi) away from the provincial capital Palu and was felt as far away as Samarinda on East Kalimantan and also in Tawau, Malaysia.

Now that was 7.5, which is much stronger the 7 - 7.1 Mag. In addition, the earthquake in the OP has a depth 65.6 km.

https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-it-about-earthquake-causes-a-tsunami
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes davenn and berkeman
Astronuc said:
Under the right conditions, including depth and location. For example,
2018 Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami

Yes, one the ones I had in mind

another one, that I always think of, was the ...
"On July 17, 1998, a 7.0 magnitude (Mw) earthquake struck the island of Papua New Guinea at 5:49 p.m. local time. But the terror for the villagers on the islands was far from over after the ground stopped shaking. Three catastrophic tsunami waves followed—devastating and razing the entire villages of Sissano, Warapu, Arop, and Malomo on the north coast of Papua New Guinea, killing at least 1,600 people, injuring 1,000, and displacing more than 10,000 people"

I remember this one well as we discussed it when I was at university geology dept.
Because for a while the real source of the tsunami wasnt found.

"The tsunami in Papua New Guinea had confirmed run-up heights of 15 meters (49 feet) at the village of Arop and 10–15 meters (33-49 feet) on a 25-kilometer (15-mile) stretch of coastline from the village of Sissano to Teles.
While most tsunamis are triggered by earthquakes, the tsunami that devastated Papua New Guinea was quite different. Since it arrived ten minutes later than predicted from earthquake sources, scientists determined that a submarine landslide generated by the earthquake actually triggered the tsunami.

This unusual occurrence generated interest in tsunami hazards in many parts of the world not previously considered at high risk of earthquake-generated landslide tsunamis. This event also brought to light the need for every country to identify the scope of their tsunami probability hazard and develop a tsunami preparedness plan."

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/day-papua-new-guinea-tsunami-1998Dave
 
davenn said:
"On July 17, 1998, a 7.0 magnitude (Mw) earthquake struck the island of Papua New Guinea at 5:49 p.m. local time.
https://www.usgs.gov/centers/pcmsc/...ce_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects

USGS image has depth of 6 km. And they corrected the magnitude to 7.6.
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000bbpf/executive

Shallow and near the coast would be a concern for tsunamis.For those interested - Tectonic summaries of magnitude 7 and greater earthquakes from 2000 to 2015 https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20161192
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...

Similar threads

Back
Top