Nanocrystalline Ni-Mo alloys of various sizes

  • Thread starter Thread starter HappyFlower
  • Start date Start date
HappyFlower
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Nanocrystalline Ni-Mo alloys of various grain sizes (d) were prepared by electrodeposition. They showed the following hardness values.
og.JPG


Homework Equations


Ho=Hi + k/d^1/2

The Attempt at a Solution


1. Plot a hardness vs d^-1/2
data.JPG

Graph
graph.JPG


3. Use best fit analysis and calculate the values for hall petch constants (Ho) and k for both sections of the graph.
I used a best fit line on the graph but a bit confused how this would help me. I don't know where to start at all. To find the hall-petch constants.
 

Attachments

  • data.JPG
    data.JPG
    5.6 KB · Views: 514
  • graph.JPG
    graph.JPG
    13.2 KB · Views: 583
  • og.JPG
    og.JPG
    5 KB · Views: 680
Physics news on Phys.org
You did not get a reply for more than 12 hours. I will give this a try. I know literally nothing about material science, after taking a look on wiki: grain boundary strengthening page, I don't think I understand the question properly!

If I would approach this problem like any other, I would say that the y-intercept in the graph is ##H_{o}##, while the slope is the strengthening coefficient ##k##.

Is this really your question? for someone taking material science this sounds like a very weird question. If this is not the what you are asking about, can you elaborate more and focus more on the exact issue rather than vaguely stating it? This will make it easier for people with no experience in materiel physics to help you.
 
Phylosopher said:
You did not get a reply for more than 12 hours. I will give this a try. I know literally nothing about material science, after taking a look on wiki: grain boundary strengthening page, I don't think I understand the question properly!

If I would approach this problem like any other, I would say that the y-intercept in the graph is ##H_{o}##, while the slope is the strengthening coefficient ##k##.

Is this really your question? for someone taking material science this sounds like a very weird question. If this is not the what you are asking about, can you elaborate more and focus more on the exact issue rather than vaguely stating it? This will make it easier for people with no experience in materiel physics to help you.
I think my professor wanted it to be a simple question and i am just over analyzing it. -,- I think you are right.
 
Side remark: I wouldn't trust that linear fit.
 
  • Like
Likes HappyFlower
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top