Natural Light and Linear Polarizer

AI Thread Summary
When natural light passes through a series of linear polarizers, starting at 0º and ending at 90º, the intensity does not drop to zero due to the presence of intermediate polarizers. An ideal setup with polarizers at infinitesimal angles between the extremes allows some light to pass through, with the final intensity being 25% of the original unpolarized light. The reduction in intensity follows the relationship Ii+1=Ii*cos^2(b), where b is the angle difference between consecutive polarizers. The electric field is reduced by a factor of cos(90º/N) for each step, leading to a cumulative effect on intensity. Thus, even with multiple polarizers, light transmission persists, confirming that the final irradiance is not zero.
Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1
Hi, In the first place I want to apologize for my bad English. In the second, I have a concept doubt, If I make natural light to go on a linear polarizer of angle 0º, the intensity, or irradiance here, It would be I0/√2 and it's Jones vector would be (1, 0) (as column). What would happen If I put infinite polarizators which angles were 0º for the first and Pi/2 for the last, changing infinitesimal angles in between?

Would I have light which irradiance would be 0 at the end?

That's what I think that might happen, because the first and last polarizators have an angle of Pi/2 between them, so the irradiance would be 0.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Nope, you'd actually get light through. You can see this by putting a polarizer at a 45 degree angle in between to polarizers set to 0 and 90 degrees. How much gets through I'm not certain.
 
Frank Einstein said:
Would I have light which irradiance would be 0 at the end?
I think that, if the polarizators are ideal, you would still have I0/√2 at the end.
 
Yes, that's right; if you use the fact that Ii+1=Ii*cos^2(b) where b is the differencie between the angles of polarization, adn is constant, you get an infinite sum which result is one.
 
The electric field gets reduced by cos(b). For one filter at 45 deg with respect to the previous one that is 1/sqrt(2), and for two steps 1/2.

The intensity is proportional to E^2, so if E gets reduced by 1/2, the intensity drops to 1/4. If you then assume that the original light was unpolarized the first filter already cuts out 1/2, and the final intensity is 1/8 of the unpolarized intensity.

Frank Einstein said:
Yes, that's right; if you use the fact that Ii+1=Ii*cos^2(b) where b is the differencie between the angles of polarization, adn is constant, you get an infinite sum which result is one.
It is not a sum, it is a product. Since all factors are the same the result is trivial.

If you have N steps, than at each step the E field gets reduced by cos(90 deg/N), i.e. (cos(90deg/N))^N in total for the E-field, and (cos(90deg/N)^(2N) for the intensity, with the additional factor 1/2 for the unpolarized incident light.
 
Drakkith said:
Nope, you'd actually get light through. You can see this by putting a polarizer at a 45 degree angle in between to polarizers set to 0 and 90 degrees. How much gets through I'm not certain.

The transmitted intensity is 25% of the incident intensity.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top