Necessity of Group Theory in Particle Physics

Marioeden
Messages
64
Reaction score
1
So I'm intending to teach myself some Particle Physics and Standard Model type stuff, I was wondering if someone who's already covered this could give me some advice.

I did some Group Theory a few years back and looking over content pages of lecture notes I occasionally spot references to groups like SO(3) and SU(2), Lie Groups, etc.

My question is simply, do I need to learn about Lie Algebras before I start any of the material or does it only involve elementary concepts? Alternatively should I do the conceptual stuff first and then come back to the mathematical approach later? Also I'm still in the early stages of learning QFT, would it be better if I finished that first and then came back to particles or is it fine to do them at the same time?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top