Need a good real analysis book for undergrad intro course

AI Thread Summary
For undergraduate students seeking a solid introduction to real analysis, particularly those with limited experience in proofs, recommendations include "Calculus" by Michael Spivak and "Calculus" by Tom Apostol. Both texts, while categorized as calculus books, are recognized for their thorough approach to foundational analysis concepts, making them suitable for beginners and intermediate learners. The discussion highlights the challenges faced by students in a 400-level real analysis course, emphasizing the need for accessible resources that effectively bridge the gap in understanding proofs and analysis. The user also mentions dissatisfaction with the current course textbook, "Undergraduate Analysis" by Serge Lang, and "Understanding Analysis" by Abbott, indicating a preference for more supportive learning materials.
hkcool
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Need a good real analysis book for undergrad "intro" course

I'm a computational math major (double majoring with MechE) and basically I'm required to take an "intro" (400 level) real analysis sequence with the comp. math department. This course is shaping up to be an incredibly nasty surprise for me since I've never had exposure to proofs before.

I've been reading up and teaching myself the basics ("How to Prove it" by Velleman is really fantastic). I think I under the basics of different proof methods but I'm still struggling immensely on the assignments. I can follow along for the most part during lecture but the professor isn't the greatest.

I have friends in the class who are really helpful but they've already taken analysis courses through the actual math dept. so they're actually way ahead of me and they don't really have time to constantly help me with every little thing. The course textbook is Undergraduate Analysis by Serge Lang. I have a copy of Understanding Analysis by Abbott too but I'm honestly not thrilled with either of them.

Just looking for a book that's very thorough but still catered to a beginner/intermediate level.

Much thanks in advance to anyone who can help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I agree with picking up a copy of Spivak's book. I took two semesters of real analysis and was seriously lacking in proof writing. That book saved me from a lot of frustration!
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top