Need a little help with this {f_n} converging to f(x) proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinsing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Converging Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if a sequence of functions {f_n} converges pointwise to a function f on a set S, then the union of the sets E_{ε,n} defined by |f_n(x) - f(x)| < ε for all ε > 0 covers the entire set S. The proof demonstrates that each E_{n,ε} is measurable and that for every x in S, there exists an N such that x belongs to E_{n,ε} for some n. The conclusion is that the union of these sets equals S, confirming the definition of pointwise convergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pointwise convergence in analysis.
  • Familiarity with measurable functions and sets.
  • Knowledge of ε-δ definitions in mathematical proofs.
  • Basic concepts of set theory, particularly unions and intersections.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of measurable functions in detail.
  • Learn about the implications of pointwise versus uniform convergence.
  • Explore the concept of convergence in probability and its applications.
  • Investigate the relationship between pointwise convergence and integrability.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis or measure theory, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of convergence and measurability.

jinsing
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that [tex]f_n \stackrel{P}{\rightarrow} f[/tex] on [tex]S[/tex]. Given [tex]\epsilon >0[/tex] define [tex]E_{\epsilon,n}=\{x\in S \mid |f_n(x)-f(x)|<\epsilon\}.[/tex]
Prove that [tex]\forall \epsilon >0[/tex] [tex]\cup_{n=1}^\infty E_{\epsilon,n}=S[/tex].

Homework Equations



Know about measurability, pointwise convergence etc.


The Attempt at a Solution



I came up with this proof, but I'm not entirely sure it's right. It's also not very formalized..but besides that it almost seems like it's missing something:

Assume {f_n} -> f pointwise on S, and given epsilon>0 define E as above. Note that E = [tex]\bigcap_{n=1}^\infty \{x \mid |f_n(x) - f(x)| < \epsilon\}.[/tex]
Since each f_n is measurable and f_n -> f pointwise, then we know f_n-f is measurable for all n in N, and so [tex]\{x \mid f_n(x) - f(x)| < \epsilon\}[/tex] is measurable for all n in N, thus E_{n,\epsilon} is a countable intersection of measurable sets and therefore measurable.
Note that E_{n,epsilon} is contained in E_{n+1,epsilon} for all n in N. Note also that since f_n -> f pointwise for all x in S, f_n(x) -> f(x) as n->\infty. So for all x in S there exists a k in N such that whenever N\geq k |f_N(x) - f(x)| < \epsilon. Hence for all x in S, x is in E_{n,\epsilon} for some n in N. Thus [tex]\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty E_{n, \epsilon} = S,[/tex] as desired.

Thanks in advance, guys!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Imo this is a bad question. There is nothing to prove just write down the definition of pointwise convergence.

let x be an element of x. By Assumption for all ε>0 there exists M s.t. if n>M |fn(x) - f(x)| <ε. Hence x is an element of En for some n.
 
Yeah, it seemed suspiciously straight-forward to me too. I guess I was wondering if there was any discrepancy between the 'given epsilon > 0' and having to prove 'for all epsilon > 0.' Is this the same thing?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K