Need guidance: Energy/gass question

AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of how much electrical energy could be generated from the condensation of atmospheric water vapor in Canada, one must first calculate the volume of water vapor present in the atmosphere, assuming it constitutes 2% by volume. This involves determining the total atmospheric pressure and using known values for air and water vapor densities. Once the mass of condensed water is found, the enthalpy change during condensation can be converted into electrical energy. The total energy produced can then be divided by Canada's average electrical consumption of 57,000 MW to estimate how long this energy would last. Accurate calculations will require surface area data for Canada and the specific enthalpy of vaporization for water.
timsher
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys! I'm really lost on this one, I don't even now where to start. If somebody could please give me some guidance on how I should go about solving this problem, I would be very grateful!


Question:

Canada’s electrical consumption is typically 57,000 MW. If all the H2O(g) in the atmosphere (assume it is 2% by volume) suddenly condensed to H2O(l), and all the enthalpy of this process was captured and converted to electrical energy, how long would this energy power the country?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much H2O gas would be condensed? Do you know the surface Area of Canada? (not offhand, but I bet you can Google it)
Atmospheric Pressure at the surface is caused by the weight (mg) of all the air above ground. (I'd presume STP unless told otherwise). air density is well-known, as is H2O gas density.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Back
Top