Need help finding inverse transformation for Jacobian

Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose R is a plane region bounded by xy=1, xy=3, x^2-y^2=1, x^2-y^2= 4. Use the substitution u=xy, v=x^2-y^2 to evaluate

I = \iint\limts_R \, (x^2+y^2) dx\,dy

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the substitutions given, I find R` = { (u,v) | u for all [1,3] ; v for all [1,4] }

So after this, it would seem I need to find the inverse transformation so I can make an appropriate substitution for the integrand and evaluate the jacobian so I can integrate over R`. However, I am having difficulties finding an explicit equation for both x and y in terms u and v. Here's what I've managed to do so far although its ultimately nothing... :(

Squaring both sides of the equations relating u and v to x, y, I find:

(I) u^2 = x^2y^2
(II) v^2 = x^4 - 2x^2y^2+y^4

Adding equations (I) + (II) I find:

(III) v^2 + 2u^2 = x^4 +y^4

Dividing (II)/(I) equations I find:

(IV) \frac{v^2}{u^2}\right) +2 = \frac{x^4+y^4}{x^2y^2}

And dividing equations (IV)/(III) I ultimately find:

x^4+y^4=2(\frac{u^2v^2+2u^4}{v^2+2u^2}\right) )+ v^2

So as I said above, I really managed to find nothing at all. I've been fiddling around with both equations for a while now in hopes of finding a desirable "form" to be able to explicitly define both x and y in terms of u and v, but I am totally stumped... Any advice or ideas would be much appreciated. :)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's v^2+4*u^2? You don't have to express x and y in terms of u and v. You just have to express x^2+y^2 in terms of u and v.
 
Last edited:
So then how should I calculate the jacobian? I thought you needed x(u,v), y(u,v) to do so.
 
You can get that jacobian by calculating the jacobian of u(x,y) and v(x,y) and inverting it. Can't you?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top