Need help plotting a 4th order polynomial

AI Thread Summary
A user is seeking assistance with plotting a fourth-order polynomial due to a lost graphing calculator and difficulties with synthetic division. The polynomial equation provided is complex, and the user emphasizes the need for precise x values for an engineering problem. Suggestions include using Wolfram Alpha and Excel for calculations, with one participant noting that there is no real solution to the equation. The user expresses frustration over previous calculations and appreciates the help received, particularly in learning to use Excel for polynomial problems. The discussion highlights the challenges of working with intricate polynomial equations and the utility of alternative tools for solving them.
david martin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I need help from someone with a graphing calculator. My little brother lost my graphing calculator and synthetic division I can't make work becasue the terms aren't exactly friendly. The equation is,

24.059025x^4 + 94.98287069x^3 + 44.56696001x^2 - 827.1103204x = -1067.832496

The more precise the x value the better, since it is a engineering type problem.

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
david martin said:
I need help from someone with a graphing calculator. My little brother lost my graphing calculator and synthetic division I can't make work becasue the terms aren't exactly friendly. The equation is,

24.059025x^4 + 94.98287069x^3 + 44.56696001x^2 - 827.1103204x = -1067.832496

The more precise the x value the better, since it is a engineering type problem.

Thanks,

If you have access to a spreadsheet you can use that.

RGV
 
Good news. There's no real solution.
 
SammyS said:
Good news. There's no real solution.

Thats bad news. I worked through two full pages of nasty algebra to get it to a simplified polynomial state, not to mention the four previous pages of prior calculations. Maybe I made a simple algebra mistake. I'm dreading having to go back and waste more time on this problem.

Thanks Ray for the spread sheet suggestion. I always knew excel could work with polynomials but never used it. This problem forced me to learn how to use it, very powerful tool. Excel gave me a value but not anything close to what I had expected.

Thanks again for eveyones help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top