1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Coursework help - Stokes Law equation + graphs

  1. Dec 1, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Hi there.
    For my A2 physics coursework I have been doing an experiment into stokes law, in which I dropped ball bearings of various diameters into a tube filled with a liquid, worked out their terminal velocities and then used Stokes Law to calculate the viscosity of the liquid. My results have been consistent and in line with my expectations. I then did another experiment, the reverse in a way, in which I used my calculated values for the viscosity of the liquids to find the diameter of ball bearing before measuring it to ensure I was gaining accurate results.

    However now I am at the stage of writing up my experiment report and I am a little unsure of what graphs to plot. I've been reading and it sounds as though I should plot a graph of radius2 over velocity, however I am unsure as to what this would show. For example, would the gradient show viscosity?

    2. Relevant equations
    The equations I've been using are μ=(d2g(Pρ-Ps))/18ν, where (Pρ-Ps) is the density of the ball bearing minus the density of the fluid, d is the diameter of the ball bearing, g is equal to 9.81 and v is the terminal velocity of the ball bearing. I believe this equation can also be written as μ=(2/9)*((Pρ-Ps)/v)*gr2, where r is the radius of the ball bearing.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I have tried to rearrange the second equation in order to get r2/v, as the graph would be I think? leaving me with 9μ/(2(Pρ-Ps)g) = r2/v, which I think would mean that r2 ∝ 1/v?
    However I am confused as to what my graph would show (i.e what the gradient would be equal to etc) and whether I have rearranged the equation correctly.

    As a side note, I am unable to ask my teacher presently as I am currently off school ill and ideally I would like to have finished my report when I go back in.
    Any help would be much appreciated, thank you!
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 1, 2014 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2017 Award

    Hello Alex, welcome to PF :) Hope you get well soon.

    It's good practice to plot experimental results by using the y axis for what you measure and the x axis for what you vary. I suppose you measured the time it took the balls to fall from one level to a lower one. And you varied the diameter and the material of the balls.

    Another good practice is to try to plot results in such a way that a linear relationship is achieved (at least according to the prediction of the theory). Sometimes that means you need to square, to take a square root or a logarithm.

    If you look at your expression, you see you can write ##\displaystyle v = {d^2 \; \Delta\rho g \over 18\mu}## which looks like ##v = C\; d^2##, so you expect a straight line if you plot something that is proportional to v as a function of something like d2.

    Here, v = distance / time means that 1/time is a good one to plot vertically. The distance ##\Delta y## is the same in all cases (right?), so you divide that out in a later stage (*).

    For the horizontal axis, asw we saw, diameter d doesn't yield a linear relationship in the theory, but d2 does.

    With three materials you hope to get get three more or less straight lines, each with slope ##\displaystyle\Delta\rho g \over 18\mu \Delta y##. Draw the best possible straight lines to determine best values for these slopes.

    As a next step, you can claim you measured three slopes as a function of ##\Delta \rho##, so you can plot these slopes vertically and ##\Delta \rho## horizontally. That line is expected to have a slope ##\displaystyle g \over 18\mu \Delta y##. Again, draw the best possible straight line to determine its values. Finally, calculate ##\mu##.

    (*) because distance is the same for all measurements, the error in the slopes doesn't get smaller if you use more different ball sizes to get a better line. (The error in the distance is 'systematic' and not statistical)
  4. Dec 1, 2014 #3
    You have the right idea. Consider plotting v/r2 vs Δρ/μ (so that the left hand side is all geometric and kinematic, and the right hand side is all physical properties). The data should all lie on a straight line.

  5. Dec 2, 2014 #4
    Thank you to both of you, you've helped me greatly!
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted