Need help proving that an infinite double sum is 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter mjordan2nd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Sum
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I am asked to prove that [itex]e^{iB}[/itex] is unitary if B is a self-adjoint matrix.

The Attempt at a Solution



In order to prove this I am attempting to show [itex]e^{iB} \widetilde{e^{iB}} = 1[/itex]. Using the assumption that B is self-adjoint I have been able to show that

[tex] <br /> e^{iB} \widetilde{e^{iB}} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^m i^{m+n} B^{m+n}}{m!n!}.<br /> [/tex]

I have looked at the first few powers of B and shown that the coefficients go to 0. I expect that this is the case in general for m+n>0, however I am having difficulty proving this (for m,n=0 the term is 1). Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that's the easiest way to prove this. If B is self-adjoint then B has a complete set of orthonomal eigenvectors with real eigenvalues. If v is an eigenvector then Bv=λv then e^(iB)v=e^(iλ)v. Pick a basis of eigenvectors and show e^(iB) is unitary directly.
 
I'm sorry, I'm a little lost by what you mean by showing the e^(iB) is unitary directly.
 
mjordan2nd said:
I'm sorry, I'm a little lost by what you mean by showing the e^(iB) is unitary directly.

If U is unitary that means <Ux,Uy>=<x,y>, right? It preserves the inner product.
 
Last edited:
I see what you're saying. I will attempt that.

I'm still interested in seeing how one would simplify the sum. Wolfram alpha confirms that the sum goes to one, so if anyone could enlighten me about this I would appreciate it.
 
mjordan2nd said:
I see what you're saying. I will attempt that.

I'm still interested in seeing how one would simplify the sum. Wolfram alpha confirms that the sum goes to one, so if anyone could enlighten me about this I would appreciate it.

If you want to specifically work with the series, then you should try to "change variables" in the series. Let k=m+n, then you should get series of the form

[tex]\sum_k \sum_m[/tex]

The inner sum (summed of m) is a finite sum. Try to get that in the form of a binomial sum.