MHB Need Help With a Trigonometric Equation?

siyanor
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
can somebody help me out on this one,i got stuck on this one
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/164
 

Attachments

  • tring.GIF
    tring.GIF
    3.5 KB · Views: 93
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Trigonometry

siyanor said:
can somebody help me out on this one,i got stuck on this one
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/164

That's a valid solution.

cos(3x-1) repeats every 2pi/3 so there won't be any more solutions in the domain given.
 
Re: Trigonometry

but how we are going to find the value of x ?(is my solution complete or it could go further than this?
 
Re: Trigonometry

siyanor said:
but how we are going to find the value of x ?(is my solution complete or it could go further than this?

You solved for x and it fits within the restricted domain the problem stated. You could combine the fractions but I think it's fine as it is.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top