Need help with my bicycle computer project

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating various physics-related metrics for a micro-controller project involving a bicycle. Key goals include determining rolling resistance on uneven surfaces, calculating power in Watts and torque in Newton meters based on gear ratios and angles, and assessing calorie expenditure. The user is struggling with their calculations, finding results that seem excessively high and not accounting for rolling resistance or surface angle changes. They seek to refine their formulas, particularly by integrating rolling resistance and the effects of incline into their calculations. The conversation emphasizes a step-by-step approach to solving these physics problems while utilizing familiar dynamometer concepts.
wmazz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am trying to work out the physics used in a micro-controller project. I am having problems with even simple relationships, like F = ma. My answers end up with much larger numbers than, a man on a bicycle should be capable of. This is just a hobby for me, and I haven't taken a physics class before.

My Goals are:

(1) Calculate rolling resistance over an uneven surface area. My project does have a 2-axis accelerometer to determine the current angle.

(2) Calculate Watts/sec and Newton meters used for any given gear ratio, speed or angle.

(3) Calculate the rate Calories are being used up.

(4) (the easy part) Displaying and recording the data on a thumb drive.

I have used many dynamometers in the past, so I am trying to stick with what's familiar. I am basing my calculations off a SAE Paper #942478 by Kee and G.P. Blair, about Inertia Dynos and they use a go-kart as an example.

(no character map in Win 7)

The formulae for Engine torque is: Torque eng = (flywheel Inertia )(Engine speed in rad/sec)(ratio of flywheel speed to engine^2) + torque due to dyno bearing friction.

They use what looks similar Kinetic Energy formulae for linear speed to determine flywheel inertia required, to simulate a given load: The formulae for Engine torque is: Torque eng = (flywheel Inertia )(Engine speed in rad/sec)(ratio of flywheel speed to engine^2) = (Kart Mass)(Engine speed in rad/sec)(ratio of engine to flywheel speed ^2)(radius, wheels^2) = Torque in Nm or N?

It's this last formulae I am trying to use : Torque in Nm or N = (Bike and rider mass)(Pedal Crank speed in rad/sec)(gear ratio^2)(radius, wheels^2) + rolling resistance

Mass = 145kg
Pedal Speed = 37pi/45 rad/sec (1 revolution of the tire is = to 37pi/45 rad/sec of the pedals)
Gear Ratio = 44 : 18 (2.444 to 1) (This is gear ratio I use the most)
Radius = .350m
Rolling Resistance = ??
Pedal Crank Length = .175m

Calcs to (145kg) (37pi/45 rad/sec) (2.44^2) ( .350^2) = 274 kg-m or Nm or N, If Newton’s than 274N * .175m = 47.97Nm or Watt/seconds or 11.45 Calories

Seems to large and doesn't account for rolling resistance, or changes in acceleration or surface angle.

I would like to do this in baby steps. Also is there a link on this site that provides a character map and how to make a fine looking post?

Thank You

Bill M.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have never taken a physics class, but I will start Pre-Calculus this fall.

I was able to quantify my formulae by changing it to be similar to F=ma. Then comparing my results by converting them to HorsePower http://users.frii.com/katana/biketext.html" .

Mass = 145kg
Pedal Speed = 22pi/9 rad/sec
Gear Ratio = 44 : 18 (2.444 to 1) (This is gear ratio I use the most)
Pedal Crank Length = .175m
Front tire radius = .350m
Rolling Resistance (Rr) = ??



I was using, Watts = ma*gear-ratio*crank length = Kg-m^2/sec^2

And I would like to compute the extra watts required for a hill. Would this work?

s = 22pi/9 rad/sec*2.444*2*r*pi = distance traveled

So, s*sin(theta) = h

Then add h to my formulae, Watts = ma*gear-ratio*crank length*h


After testing I could add Rolling Resistance (Rr) to the formulae:

Watts = ma*gear-ratio*crank length*h + Rr


So is my addition of " s*sin(theta) = h" correct, and the idea that I can add Rolling resistance gatherd by testing to the equation ??

Thanks

this may be helpfull http://users.frii.com/katana/biketext.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's this last formulae I am trying to use : Torque in Nm or N = (Bike and rider mass)(Pedal Crank speed in rad/sec)(gear ratio^2)(radius, wheels^2) + rolling resistance
The bike+rider mass will have a say in the rolling resistance expression only.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...

Similar threads

Back
Top