Need opinions on my Differential Eqations textbook

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the effectiveness of the textbook "A First Course in Differential Equations" by Dennis G. Zill for learning differential equations. The original poster expresses dissatisfaction with the book, feeling that it lacks solid explanations and does not facilitate deep understanding. They seek alternative recommendations, mentioning positive experiences with other authors like Martin Braun, Guterman and Nitecki, V. Arnol'd, and Harry Pollack. Other participants suggest various textbooks, including V. Arnol'd's work and Boyce and DiPrima's, noting that these texts may provide clearer explanations and a better learning experience. Some users share their own experiences with different textbooks, highlighting that their classes used Blanchard, Devaney, and Hall, which they found easier and more accessible. The conversation also touches on whether the first differential equations course is merely an introductory class that lacks depth, with participants sharing mixed experiences regarding the complexity and comprehensiveness of their courses.
Mathgician
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what you guys think of my textbook.
My textbook is called:

A First Course in Differential Eqations (Eight Edition)

Author: Dennis G. Zill

ISBN: 0534418783

I have been using this book for my DE class, and I do not feel like I am really learning anything. This class is very different from my other math classes, I learn methods that I am not getting a solid explanations for. Most people I've gone for help that has taken this class before have forgotten most of the materials that has been tought in this class. I want to get the most out of my DE class, is there another book you guys suggest that will help me understand DE and not forget it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i liked martin braun, and guterman and nitecki, and v. arnol'd, and the great classic by harry pollack.

there is a textbook recommendation thread here by the way.
 
Also, another question, is the first differential equations course just a beginning course that does not go indepth? I just don't feel like I am learning anything or in other words getting any insights. Tell me your experience people.
 
Mathgician said:
I have been using this book for my DE class, and I do not feel like I am really learning anything.
I can relate to that, and I suggest you take a peek at V. Arnol'd's book.

But I can't relate to

Mathgician said:
I learn methods that I am not getting a solid explanations for.

We used the book by Boyce and DiPrima when I took the class. Maybe it will help you fix that problem.
 
Yeah -- I like (second) Boyce and DiPrima as a first text.
 
My class uses Blanchard, Devaney, and Hall. It has been one of the easiest math classes I've ever taken. I don't know if this text is as advanced as texts other colleges might use, but apparently our professor taught this same course at a more pretigious university and my class is owning that class.
 
B, D and H is easy because they do not prove anything as i recall.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
19K
Back
Top