Need replacement advise for KA3525A IC

  • Thread starter Thread starter HomeExperiement
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Advise Ic
AI Thread Summary
The KA3525A IC needs replacement due to damage from a shorted potentiometer, with the KH52AD marking likely indicating the manufacturing plant and date code. The SG3525A is often found as a direct replacement, sharing the same pin-out and internal specifications, making it a viable option for substitution. While the SG3525A may have a longer feature list and better documentation, both ICs are compatible in function. It is recommended to compare data sheets to confirm specifications, but generally, replacing the KA3525A with the SG3525A should be safe. Overall, the SG3525A is a common and reliable alternative for this application.
HomeExperiement
Messages
55
Reaction score
5
Hi!

I need to replace KA3525A IC because I damaged mine with shorted potentiometer. I have question: I also has KH52AD marking on it. Is this also important? I can find KA3525A from aliexpress but KH52AD doesn't seem to show this unit. And when I search for KA3525A, also SG3525A seems to show up in search results quite often. Can they both be used interchangeably is it important that it is KA3525A (like is one just newer model than other or are the 2 different things)?
 

Attachments

  • KA3525A.JPG
    KA3525A.JPG
    20.7 KB · Views: 447
Engineering news on Phys.org
The KA3525A is a common SMPS controller IC in a 16 pin DIP.
KH52AD may be a manufacturing plant and date code.
The SG3525A has the same pin-out, internal block diagram and reference voltage, so I expect it is a direct replacement.
 
Ok, tnx. I also noticed that SG3525A is better documented. What do you exactly mean by direct replacement?
Also, which one should I get? SG3525A seemed to have a bit longer feature list so it looks like newer but I am not 100% sure. In other words replacing KA3525A with SG3525A should be fine?
 
The 3525A is an very common (and old) SMPS control IC. The prefix letters usually just refer to the manufacturer. They are very likely to be compatible, certainly in pin-out and function. Unfortunately, the only way you'll know for sure is to compare the data sheets. Assuming no one's life depends on it, I would just replace it with SG3525A.

BTW the SG stands for Silicon General, the original company (long gone, now part of TI) that originally designed this IC in the early 1980's. This is the most common part number for this IC amongst generic manufacturers.
 
HomeExperiement said:
What do you exactly mean by direct replacement?
The masks used to make the silicon chip may be different from different manufacturers, but the specifications will be equivalent to, or better than, the original product. Two manufacturers may merge, or may agree to share some masks to become a second source for an identical product.

The “quantity of specifications” will be reduced as more manufacturers begin to manufacture direct equivalents. The best data sheets and application notes are usually from the original manufacturer, since it was in their interest to help engineers introduce the new product.
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top