Negative and Positive E-Field Components

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field components in specified regions based on electric potential changes. For regions (a) and (c), the electric field is zero due to constant potential, indicating no change in electric field strength. In region (b), the electric field is calculated as -6.25 V, which signifies that the field points in the opposite direction of the displacement, indicating negative work on a positive charge. The relationship between electric field direction and potential change is emphasized, with the field vector pointing from higher to lower potential. Visualizing the scenario as a capacitor helps in understanding the behavior of charged particles in the electric field.
Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,175
Reaction score
7,625

Homework Statement


In the diagram below, each division on the horizontal axis (the displacement s) is 0.10 m while each division on the vertical axis (the electric potential V) is 1.0 V. What is the electric field component along the displacement axis s in each of the regions specified below? Include the sign of the value in your answer.
(a) from 0.0 m to 0.10m
(b) from 0.10m to 0.90m
(c) from 0.90m to 1.00m

voltage graph.gif

Homework Equations



ΔV=Vf-Vi = -∫E⋅ds

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that the e-field for a and c is zero. A constant potential means that the e-field isn't changing.
My question is about b. The answer is -6.25 V, but I can't wrap my head around what this means. What's the difference between an e-field of +6.25 V and -6.25 V? Is it just the direction the e-field points compared to the direction you're moving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's about it. The field vector should respect the coordinate system that's in place. So here the spatial component is the s-axis, increasing to the right, and the potential increases to the right, too. So the e-field vector, pointing from higher potential to lower potential, points to the left.
 
Alright. So then the e-field would perform negative work on a positive test charge brought in from the left, and therefor the change in potential, the negative of the work done divided by the charge, is positive, right?
 
Drakkith said:
Alright. So then the e-field would perform negative work on a positive test charge brought in from the left, and therefor the change in potential, the negative of the work done divided by the charge, is positive, right?
Right. I sometimes find it helpful to imagine that the region in question is bordered by two plates, like in a capacitor. The potential difference between the plates is established by a voltage supply of the appropriate size. Then I can easily picture the field lines and what a charged particle situated in or moving through the region will experience.
upload_2016-2-22_22-24-49.png
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top