Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am trying to prove the nested interval theorem for R^n. It is stated as follows:

Let (K_i : i in N) be a decreasing sequence of bounded closed sets in R^n and each K_i is non empty. Then the intersection of all K_i for i in N is not empty.

This is what I have so far:

Since K_i is nonempty, there exists a p_i in K_i for i in N. Pick these points to form the sequence (p_i : i in N). Because (p_i : i in N) is bounded, it has at least one convergent subsequence by the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem.

I want to claim that the limit point of this subsequence is in the intersection of all K_i. But I am having trouble formalizing this part of the argument. Any help?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Nested interval theorem for R^n

Loading...

Similar Threads for Nested interval theorem |
---|

I What do Stokes' and Green's theorems represent? |

I Why can we WLOG derive Simpson's rule over interval -1 to 1 |

I Must functions really have interval domains for derivatives? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**