Net Charge of Cube: -2385075 uC

  • Thread starter Thread starter irnubcake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Cube Net
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net charge contained within a cube using Gauss's law. The electric field on the top face is -37 N/C and on the bottom face is +15 N/C, with the cube's edge length being 3.5 m. The initial calculations for electric flux were incorrect, leading to an erroneous net charge of -2385075 µC. Correct application of Gauss's law requires accurate flux calculations for both surfaces. Participants are encouraged to re-evaluate their calculations using the proper area and electric field values.
irnubcake
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At each point on the surface of a cube the electric field is parallel to the z axis. The length of each edge of the cube is 3.5 m. On the top face of the cube the electric field is in the negative z direction and has a magnitude of 37 N/C magnitude. On the bottom face of the cube the field is in the positive z direction and has a magnitude of 15 N/C. Determine the net charge contained within the cube.

The Attempt at a Solution



The electric flux at the top face = EA = (-37 N/C)(3.5m)^2 = -453.25 N.m^2/C
At the bottom face = (15 N/C)(3.5m)^2 = 183.75 N.m^2/C

Gauss's law: flux * permittivity constant = charge
Applied on cube: (net flux)(permittivity constant) = net charge
(-269.5 Nm^2/C)(8.85*10^-12) = -2.385075 * 10^-9 C
= -2385075 uC (micro)
Both value and units are incorrect. > < "
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

Basically, you used the correct physical law.
But some mistake is done when the eletric flux was calculated.
The top surface:\vec{A}_t=3.5^2\hat{z}(m^2) and \vec{E}_t=-37\hat{z}(N^2/C).
The bottom surface:\vec{A}_b=-3.5^2\hat{z}(m^2) and \vec{E}_b=+15\hat{z}(N^2/C)
You may use these quantities and try again.
Also notice the constant in Gauss's law:\oint\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A}=\frac{Q_\text{total}}{\epsilon_0}


Goodluck
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top