Net electric field by two curved rods

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the direction of the electric field at the midpoint between two positively charged curved rods. Initially, it was believed that the electric field would point upward due to the extra length of the lower rod. However, the consensus is that the electric field actually points downward. This is because the electric field contributions from the top sections of the rods cancel each other out, leaving only the lower segments to influence the field direction. The reasoning highlights the importance of considering the geometry and distribution of charge in electric field calculations.
celee2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?courses/phys212/oldexams/exam1/sp08/fig4.gif

Two curved rods each have charge +Q uniformly distributed over their length. Which statement best describes the electric field due to these two rods at the midpoint between the two rods marked by an X ?

(a) E points up.
(b) E points down.
(c) E = 0.

Homework Equations



It's more like geometry I think.

The Attempt at a Solution



I definitely thought E would point up since the rod at the bottom has extra length that has positive charge, which would affect electric field to the radially outward direction. But the answer is b, E points down. Could anyone explain the reason? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
E should point up. If your problem statement and diagram are accurate, then the answer is wrong. The top section should cancel out exactly with the segment of the bottom rod that is directly opposite. This leaves two portions of the bottom rod to contribute to the direction of the field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top