Net force holds object in equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
A 6.0 kg box is held in equilibrium by two ropes at 30-degree angles with the vertical while a downward force of 410 N acts on it. The weight of the box is calculated as 58.8 N, leading to a total downward force of 469 N when combined with the external force. The tension in each rope, denoted as T, must balance this total downward force. The correct approach involves recognizing that the vertical components of the two tensions must equal the total downward force, leading to the equation 2*T*cos(30) = 469 N. The final answer for the magnitude of a single tension T is 271 N, confirming the need to account for both ropes in the calculations.
Newlander
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A 6.0 kg box is held at rest by two ropes that form 30-degree angles with the vertical. An external force F acts vertically downward on the box. The force exerted by each of the two ropes is denoted by T. . . . The magnitude of force F is 410 N. The magnitude of force T is closest to: . . ."

m = 6.0 kg
a = -9.8 m/s2
vi = 0 m/s
fF = 410 N
fT = ?

A figure is included in the practice example, but I am unable to upload it. Each rope is denoted by T--and this is key to the questions I have about the problem, noted below.



Homework Equations


w = mg

Fnet = ma

cos [theta] = adjacent/hypotenuse



The Attempt at a Solution


w = mg
fW = mg = 6.0 kg * -9.8 m/s2 =-58.8 N

Fnet = ma
Fnet, negative-y-axis = -58.8 N + (-410 N) = -469 N

cos [theta] = adjacent/hypotenuse = 469/T
--> T = 469/cos30 = 542 N

Concerns:
First, I'm not sure if I determined the magnitude of T the correct way. I figured I could use the positive y-axis as the equal but opposite force of the net force of fw and fF; this would in turn serve as the "adjacent" aspect of the trig function calculation.
Second, the problem refers to "force T" as if it is a singular force--but in the diagram (and explanation), there are two ropes denoted by T.
Third, the answer is provided: it is 271 N--exactly half of what I thought the magnitude of a *single* T is. I'm guessing I may be on the right path but am missing something because of the double nature of the force T--just not sure how to convey it in my work. (This isn't something to turn in--I just want to understand how to correctly do such a problem.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
469 N force is balance by the components of 2 Ts in the vertical direction.
So 2*T*cos(30) = 469.
 
I think I understand what you mean by the balance of components, as the y-axis divides the two T forces, but . . . I'm still not following, exactly. Any other way to frame it? Would you have approached things similarly?
 
The title of the post says that Net force holds object in equilibrium
Since point of action of two tensions and the weight of the box and the force are in equilibrium, the resultant of two tensions must be equal to the total downward force.
The angle between tensions is 60 degrees. Find the resultant of the tensions and equate it to the total force. That gives you the magnitude of the tension.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top