Net Force Work & Kinetic Energy Increase: 600J & 450J

AI Thread Summary
A net force of 60N accelerates a 4kg mass over a distance of 10m, resulting in work done of 600J. The initial calculation of kinetic energy increase was incorrectly based on acceleration rather than final velocity. The correct approach involves using the equation V^2 = U^2 + 2*a*d to find the final velocity, which leads to a kinetic energy increase of 600J. The law of conservation of energy confirms that all work done translates into increased kinetic energy. Understanding the relationship between work, force, and kinetic energy is essential for solving these types of physics problems.
mike2007
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
A net force fo 60N accelerates a 4kg mass over a distance of 10m.
a) What is the work done by the net force?
b) What is the increase in kinetic energy of the mass?

This is what i did, i am not too sure of part b

F = 60N
M = 4kg
d = 10m
W = Fd
= 60N*10m
Answer =600J

F = ma
60N = 4kg*a
a = F/m
=60N/4kg
= 15m/s2

KE = ½(mv2)
= ½(4kg*15m/s2)
Answer = 450J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey, 15m/s/s is the acceleration not the final velocity.
you can get the final velocity by V^2 = U^2 + 2*a*d, you take U=0 and V comes out to be sq. root of 300.
now use KE = (m*v^2)/2 (increase in KE is final ke- initial ke )
and you ll get 600 J.
you could have also done it by a very awesome law(hahaha ) called the law of conservation of energy. all the work you are putting in the mass is going to increase the kinetic energy. duh.. so simple
 
what does work done tell you?

anyway, in part b) you have worked out acceleration from F... but you need velocity for your KE formula (did u see that?)

firstly, you are looking for gain in KE, so at least you would have something that looks like
\Delta KE = \frac{1}{2}mv_f^2-\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2answer is not 450J
 
ank_gl said:
hey, 15m/s/s is the acceleration not the final velocity.
you can get the final velocity by V^2 = U^2 + 2*a*d, you take U=0 and V comes out to be sq. root of 300.
now use KE = (m*v^2)/2 (increase in KE is final ke- initial ke )
and you ll get 600 J.
you could have also done it by a very awesome law(hahaha ) called the law of conservation of energy. all the work you are putting in the mass is going to increase the kinetic energy. duh.. so simple

Aside: you don't need to take U=0.
 
yes u don't need to take U=0 actually, V ll adjust anyways and you ll still get the increase in KE as 600 joule. sorry for taking a special case.
also this is a very basic concept, think a bit and you ll yourself figure out the answer.
 
F = ma
60N = 4kg*a
a = F/m
=60N/4kg
= 15m/s2

KE = ½(mv2)
= ½(4kg*15m/s2)
Answer = 450J

That's the correct calculation of acceleration, but the part you did after that was wrong because you should have used the velocity. Moreover they didn't tell you the initial velocity of this object, so what you really want to get the change in kinetic energy is the change in the velocity squared.

Now consider for constant acceleration:

v_f^2-v_i^2 = 2a\Delta x
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top