Neumann Problem: Use the divergence theorem to show it has a solution

ProtonHarvest
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
From Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction, by Walter A. Strauss; Chapter 1.5, no.4 (b).

Homework Statement


"Consider the Neumann problem
(delta) u = f(x,y,z) in D

\frac{\partial u}{\partial n}=0 on bdy D."

"(b) Use the divergence theorem and the PDE to show that

\int\int\int_{D}f(x,y,z)dxdydz = 0

is a necessary condition for the Neumann problem to have a solution."

Homework Equations


Divergence Theorem:
\int\int\int_{D}\nabla\cdot \vec{f} d\vec{x} = \int\int_{S}f\cdot \vec{n}dS

In this case d\vec{x} is a vector component I understand to translate to dxdydz, and I understand the rest of the divergence theorem.

The Attempt at a Solution


I wish I could but I don't know where to start; maybe I am rusty, maybe the question is worded strangely; maybe I'm over-thinking it. This is for a pure math PDE class, so even though I get why the condition is necessary from a physics perspective, I can't explain it in a math context, so I'm not sure how or what to apply the divergence theorem on.

If anyone can lend me a small clue to start me off that would be wonderful. I'm going to be checking this constantly so I will certainly respond.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not to be critical, but check the number you posted. you have posted that you need to do ch 1.2 #4 (b). that is ch 1.5 #4 (b). So either typed it wrong or you are on the wrong problem, b/c I am in a course using the same book. If you are doing the correct problem, then I can say I have no earthly idea where to start.
 
DarthBane, you're right, it is Chapter 1.5, I've edited it. Thanks for the heads up.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top