Neutral atom and a point charge

AI Thread Summary
When the distance between a neutral atom and a point charge is doubled, the force on the atom remains zero, as there is no direct force acting between them. The discussion highlights that while gravitational forces exist, they are negligible in this context. The focus is primarily on electric forces, which do not apply to a neutral atom without considering induced dipoles. The participants express confusion over the calculations and the implications of distance on force interactions. Ultimately, the conclusion is that both the old and new forces are zero, leading to a ratio of zero for the force change.
tuggler
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the distance between a neutral atom and a point charge is doubled, by what factor does the force on the atom by the point charge change? (new force / old force)

2. The attempt at a solution

Wouldn't the answer just be (new force / old force) = 0 since there is no force between a neutral atom and a point charge? But it is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe they are taking the gravitational force into account? Although it is negligible, technically it does have some effect.
 
I'll bet it is focusing on the Electric Force ... because it specifies neutral atom and "point charge".
the old Force was zero (ignoring induced dipole in the atom being attracted to charge),
the new Force is zero also (ignoring induced dipole)
=> that would mean the Force is the same ... multiplied by "1".

If you're responsible for induced dipole attraction, then calculate that after finding the monopole Force is zero.
 
Hmm I am still not understanding. So the ratio should be new force / old force = 0/1?
 
Last edited:
tuggler said:

Homework Statement



If the distance between a neutral atom and a point charge is doubled, by what factor does the force on the atom by the point charge change? (new force / old force)

2. The attempt at a solution

Wouldn't the answer just be (new force / old force) = 0 since there is no force between a neutral atom and a point charge? But it is wrong.

This is in a 2nd semester elementary physics text?

To your problem, it doesn't necessarily mean there is no net force on your test particle. Imagine this problem in one-dimension. (This will create the greatest difference in force) If your test particle was close to the atom it would recognize two distinct charges effecting it: one the electron and the other the proton. The net force would be the usual sum of them. You can, and will if your a physics major, extend this to 3-D to be more general.

If you set the distance, D, to be the distance from the particle to the proton, then you can out the distance between the electron and the particle. (i.e. D-r_{A}, where r_{A} is the atomic radius.) This does assume that the 'orbit' of the electron remains the same. Either way I find myself defining distance variables, which I find unsettling because I can do it a number of ways. This would be fine if you were studying advance E&M, but looking for exact answers here. Is there more information?

Oh and you are correct about one thing, if the distance to the atom is significantly greater than the atomic radius the particle would experience no force. Basically D-r_{A}≈D
 
lightgrav said:
I'll bet it is focusing on the Electric Force ... because it specifies neutral atom and "point charge".
the old Force was zero (ignoring induced dipole in the atom being attracted to charge),
the new Force is zero also (ignoring induced dipole)
=> that would mean the Force is the same ... multiplied by "1".

If you're responsible for induced dipole attraction, then calculate that after finding the monopole Force is zero.

0/0≠1

You can multiply by any number and still get zero.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top