Neutron energy needed to produce fission of 208Pb

Sswift
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Estimate the neutron energy needed to produce fission of 208Pb. Is it likely that such neutrons woould be released in the resulting fission?

Homework Equations



Eexcitation=Qexcitation+Tn
Qexcitation=[m(208Pb)+mn-m(209Pb)]c2
V=(e2/4πεo)(Z1Z2/r)
r=1.2fm[(A1)1/3+(A2)1/3]




The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a little confused just on how to approach this problem. I know that in order to fission the excitation energy must be greater than the activation energy. But doesn't the activation energy depend on what the products of the fission reaction are, of which there is more than one possible combination?

Anyways my best guess was to just come up with a fission reaction that could possibly happen and since Z=50 and N=82 are nuclear shell magic numbers I came up with the following

208Pb + n → 132Sn + 75Ge + 2n

using
Q = [m(208Pb)+mn-m(132Sn) - m(75Ge)- 2mn]

and
Eactivation= V - Q

I find the activation energy and then find the kinetic energy the neutron needs for the excitation energy to be greater than the activation energy.

My main problem is I don't know if I'm alright assuming the fission products I did. And as I look around on the internet I get the sense that the activation energy is a set value for a particular isotope, which greatly confuses me. If anyone could just kinda push me in the right direction that would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sswift said:

Homework Statement



Estimate the neutron energy needed to produce fission of 208Pb. Is it likely that such neutrons woould be released in the resulting fission?

Homework Equations



Eexcitation=Qexcitation+Tn
Qexcitation=[m(208Pb)+mn-m(209Pb)]c2
V=(e2/4πεo)(Z1Z2/r)
r=1.2fm[(A1)1/3+(A2)1/3]

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a little confused just on how to approach this problem. I know that in order to fission the excitation energy must be greater than the activation energy. But doesn't the activation energy depend on what the products of the fission reaction are, of which there is more than one possible combination?

Anyways my best guess was to just come up with a fission reaction that could possibly happen and since Z=50 and N=82 are nuclear shell magic numbers I came up with the following

208Pb + n → 132Sn + 75Ge + 2n

using
Q = [m(208Pb)+mn-m(132Sn) - m(75Ge)- 2mn]

and
Eactivation= V - Q

I find the activation energy and then find the kinetic energy the neutron needs for the excitation energy to be greater than the activation energy.

My main problem is I don't know if I'm alright assuming the fission products I did. And as I look around on the internet I get the sense that the activation energy is a set value for a particular isotope, which greatly confuses me. If anyone could just kinda push me in the right direction that would be greatly appreciated!

It's correct that Eactivation= V - Q
if Eactivation less than binding energy of last neutron in 209Bi
then a neutron with zero kinetic energy , fission immediately occur
but if Eactivation greater than binding energy of last neutron
the difference between them is neutron kinetic energy
 
also see John .R lamarsh- introduction to nuclear reactor theory chapter 3
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top