Newbie: why use the vorticity eqn to get streamlines instead of solving for x and y?

  • Thread starter bzz77
  • Start date
  • #1
34
0
Hello all:

I'm reading an old paper (from the 1980s) where someone solved the vorticity equation to get streamlines for flow. This is probably a silly question, but I'd be interested to know why he may have used this method instead of solving for the x and y (it's a 2-D set-up) components of flow.

Might it have been because of the more limited computational facilities back then, or could there be another advantage to using the vorticity method?

I'd like to know because I want to write some code for calculating fluid parcel trajectories over time. And I'm wondering where to start--which governing equations to use, etc. If anyone has any general advice, I'd love to hear it. Thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

Related Threads on Newbie: why use the vorticity eqn to get streamlines instead of solving for x and y?

Replies
13
Views
418
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
780
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
717
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top