Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Newbie: why use the vorticity eqn to get streamlines instead of solving for x and y?

  1. Jan 2, 2012 #1
    Hello all:

    I'm reading an old paper (from the 1980s) where someone solved the vorticity equation to get streamlines for flow. This is probably a silly question, but I'd be interested to know why he may have used this method instead of solving for the x and y (it's a 2-D set-up) components of flow.

    Might it have been because of the more limited computational facilities back then, or could there be another advantage to using the vorticity method?

    I'd like to know because I want to write some code for calculating fluid parcel trajectories over time. And I'm wondering where to start--which governing equations to use, etc. If anyone has any general advice, I'd love to hear it. Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Newbie: why use the vorticity eqn to get streamlines instead of solving for x and y?
  1. Solve t²-x² (Replies: 5)

  2. Why is it useful (Replies: 3)

Loading...