Newton 2nd law + frame of reference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Newton's 2nd Law in analyzing the motion of two blocks with friction, where one block is pulled by a force F. The key point is that while F equals the static friction f_s when the top block does not slide, this relationship does not hold when considering an inertial frame of reference, such as the ground. In an inertial frame, both blocks accelerate, necessitating a net force on the top block. Alternatively, in a non-inertial frame (the bottom block), an inertial force must be included in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's 2nd Law
  • Knowledge of static friction and its maximum value (f_s(max))
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams
  • Concept of inertial vs. non-inertial frames of reference
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's 2nd Law in inertial frames
  • Learn about inertial forces in non-inertial frames of reference
  • Explore static friction and its role in motion analysis
  • Practice drawing and interpreting free-body diagrams for complex systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of systems involving friction and different frames of reference.

fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
hello forum,

i am struggling with the conceptual understanding of this problem:
Given two blocks, one on top of the other. There is friction between the two blocks.
The upper block is pulled with a force F. Thanks to friction, as long as F is smaller or equal to the static friction f_s(max) the objects will move, accelerate together, withouth having the top block slide over the lower block...

The free-body diagram of the top block involves only two forces in the horizontal direction: F and f_s. F=f_s for the top block not to slide while being pulled.

But that seems from the frame of reference of the lower block...

If we are observing the situation from the ground, the top (and bottom) block is accelerating, moving, so a net force need to be there...

The upper block is not moving relative to the lower block (relative velocity=0).

What is the correct frame of reference to use? I would say the one fixed with the ground (because inertial). But that would imply a net force on the top block, while we just have

F=f_s

thanks
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fisico30 said:
The free-body diagram of the top block involves only two forces in the horizontal direction: F and f_s.
That's true.
F=f_s for the top block not to slide while being pulled.
That's not true.

But that seems from the frame of reference of the lower block...

If we are observing the situation from the ground, the top (and bottom) block is accelerating, moving, so a net force need to be there...
Absolutely.

The upper block is not moving relative to the lower block (relative velocity=0).

What is the correct frame of reference to use? I would say the one fixed with the ground (because inertial). But that would imply a net force on the top block, while we just have

F=f_s
You can use either frame to analyze this problem. To use the inertial frame of the ground, just apply Newton's 2nd law as usual to both blocks.

But if you want to use the accelerating frame of the bottom block, then you'll have to modify Newton's laws to include an inertial force acting on the top block. The sum of all forces--including the inertial force--must add to zero. That's a bit different from saying F = f_s (which isn't true).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K