Newton 2nd law of a fish in an elevator

AI Thread Summary
When weighing a fish in an accelerating elevator, the spring scale reading differs from the fish's actual weight due to the effects of acceleration. The tension in the scale, T, can be expressed as T = mg + ma, where m is the mass of the fish, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and a is the elevator's acceleration. The equation can be rewritten as T = mg(1 + a/g), illustrating how the scale reading changes with varying acceleration. If the elevator accelerates upwards, the tension increases, while downward acceleration decreases the tension, potentially leading to zero tension in free fall. Understanding these relationships clarifies the impact of acceleration on the perceived weight of the fish.
Agent M27
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A person weighs a fish of mass m on a spring scale atached to the ceiling of an elevator.
(a) Show that if the elevator accelerates either up or down, the spring scale gives a reading different from the weight of the fish.


Homework Equations



\SigmaFy=T-Fg=may

Where T is the tension of the scale acting opposite to that of gravity, Fg

Fg=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


I figure that I needed to solve for the tension in terms of the acceleration of the elevator and accelleration due to gravity.

I found T= may+Fg

But the book gave me an equation of this form:

T=mg+ma=mg(\frac{a}{g}+1)

I don't understand where they got the a divided by g + 1 factor from. Any clues would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start from

T = mg + ma

Factor out on the right side mg.

What do you get?
 
When the texts rewrite an equation like this, they are usually trying to make the ideas easier to understand. If a = 0 then T = mg If a = g then T = 2mg and so on... so the larger a gets in the +y direction, the greater the tension, which makes sense. If a = -9.8 (down), then T would be equal to zero and the object is in free fall.

So essentially the text is saying try out different accelerations, a, and when you do, does this make physical sense.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top