Newton measures the speed of gravity

AI Thread Summary
Newton's formulation of gravity predates the discovery of the gravitational constant (G) and the mass of the Earth, making it challenging to identify the exact equations he used. The discussion revolves around the need for an equation that reflects the inverse square law of gravity without relying on known constants. The equation (Gm1m2)/r^2 = (m2v2)/r is deemed unsuitable since Newton lacked knowledge of G and Earth's mass. Instead, the acceleration of the moon can be derived from its angular speed and radius, leading to the conclusion that the 1/r^2 relationship can be established through empirical measurements. This highlights the foundational principles of gravitational theory that Newton developed based on observational data.
bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This doesn't come from a textbook but it's like a homework question so I thought it would be more appropriate here.

Screenshot2012-02-26at72344PM.png


Screenshot2012-02-26at72340PM.png

I'm trying to figure out what equation Newton used since the force of gravity or the mass of the Earth was not known until Cavendish. I'm looking for an equation that has the square of the distance or the radius, but all I can find is

(Gm1m2)/r^2 = (m2v2)/r

But Newton couldn't have used that one because he didn't know G or the mass of the Earth. I also thought about a = (v^2)/r but Newton didn't know the acceleration.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In this case, you can calculate the acceleration of the moon from its angular speed and radius:

a = v^2/r = 4∏^2r/T^2

By measuring the acceleration of the moon and of an object on the surface of the earth, you get the 1/r^2 relationship.

AM
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top