Newtons Divided Difference First Derivative

NotASmurf
Messages
150
Reaction score
2
Hey all, for a function approximation program t run fast enough i need to solve for where the function (represented by a NDDP) is at a minimum (necessary trust me), althogh I have no idea how to go about differentiating it, i tried to break it up from its's general formula (the pi operators and the sigma summations make the differentiation difficult for me as i have never had to differentiate a pi operator before), but that seems to make things worst is the first derivative for a nth order NDDP known? Any help apreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2.2 here perhaps ? Or did you find that already ?
 
  • Like
Likes NotASmurf
Thanks :D
 
Wasnt familiar with the reccurance relation version so that paper didn't help too much, however found a nice pattern, turns out the derivative is

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{k<=n}\sum_{i=0}^{k} \Pi_{j=0, j \neq i}^{k-1} (x-x_j) $$

You can see it in action here for 4th order poly
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-2-29_18-11-58.png
    upload_2016-2-29_18-11-58.png
    32.7 KB · Views: 467
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top