Newton's law, normal force, acceleration

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about a 75 kg person in an elevator accelerating upward at 135 m/s², participants analyze the forces acting on the individual, specifically the normal force and weight. The calculation for the normal force (FN) is presented as FN = mg + ma, leading to a result of 10860 N, which is questioned due to the unrealistic acceleration value. Participants suggest that the acceleration might actually be 1.35 m/s², which yields a more reasonable scale reading. Despite the confusion, it is confirmed that the calculations are correct based on the given data, highlighting a potential error in the source material. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying problem parameters in physics.
jehan4141
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
A 75 kg person is standing on a bathroom scale in an elevator. The scale is calibrated to read in Newtons. The elevator is accelerating upward at 135 m/s2. What is the reading on the scale? What apparent value of g does the man give?



The Free Body Diagram
Normal on the man, upward
Weight mg of the man, downward



My Attempt/Logic
The only two forces acting on the man are normal force and weight.

FN - mg = ma
fN = mg + ma, where N is the reading on the scale.

FN = (75)(9.8) + (75)(135)
FN = 10860 N

The solution reads 8.5x102 N? Am I doing something wrong? This problem seems very basic, but I am obviously missing something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure the acceleration wasn't 1.35 m/s^2. 135 m/s^2 is not very realistic.
 
It is much closer with 1.35 m/s2, However it is still a little off? I am not sure if there is even anything wrong with the way I am doing it :( it seems correct?
 
jehan4141 said:
It is much closer with 1.35 m/s2, However it is still a little off?
If you take g = 10 m/s^2 it's pretty close. (But it definitely says 135 m/s^2.)
I am not sure if there is even anything wrong with the way I am doing it :( it seems correct?
Your work is perfectly fine, and given the data, so is your answer.
 
Thank you so much! It's very surprising that the solution could be wrong because if you read the preface of the packet it says that this learning guide has been edited many times over the course of many decades!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top