Newton's method and Mean Value theorem

Lily@pie
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



let x0, x1,... be the approximations of pi from the Newton's Method. Use Mean Value theorem to show that
|pi-xj+1|=|tan2cj||pi-xj|
for some cj between xj and pi

Homework Equations



pi is defined as smallest positive number r when sin r =0

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to let f(x) = sin x and the bound to be [x,pi].
By using the mean value theorem, there exist some c such that
f'(c) = (sin pi - sin x) / (pi - x)
cos c = - sin x / (pi-x)
But I couldn't get the form, especially the |tan2cj| part.

I have also tried to let f(x) = tan x - x in [x,pi]
so, f'(c)=sec2c + 1 = (tan pi + pi - tan x - x)/(pi-x)
tan2 c = (tan pi - tan x + pi - x)/(pi-x)
But tan pi is undefined...

Am I on the correct path?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lily@pie said:
I have also tried to let f(x) = tan x - x in [x,pi]
so, f'(c)=sec2c + 1 = (tan pi + pi - tan x - x)/(pi-x)
tan2 c = (tan pi - tan x + pi - x)/(pi-x)
But tan pi is undefined...

Am I on the correct path?

This second route is a good path. Note tan(pi) = sin(pi)/cos(pi) = 0/(-1) = 0. Then you're done, assuming you know what Newton's method is.

This was actually a decent problem.
 
I've used f(x) = tan x - x

and manage to find
tan2cj= (-pi + xj - tan xj)/(pi - xj)

From intermediate theorem,
xj+1 = xj - (tan xj - xj)/tan2xj

Hence, I get
tan2cj
= (-pi + xj+1 - tan xj + (tan xj - xj)/tan2xj))/ (pi-xj)

I have tried all sorts of method to evaluate this but still couldn't get the form (pi-xj+1)/(pi-xj)...

I have tried opening the tan x, but still stuck...

Did I do it correctly? Do you mind providing any hints?
 
You shouldn't go back to the intermediate value theorem. The problem statement tells you that we're approximating pi with Newton's method. The fact that pi is defined as smallest positive number r when sin r = 0 makes it clear how the sequence that defines Newton's method is generated here. We are approximating a root of sin(x) basically. Now write out the sequence that defines Newton's method.
 
Oh! Thank you so much!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top