Newton's Second Law of Motion -- Three masses, an inclined plane and a pulley

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving Newton's Second Law of Motion, specifically focusing on three masses, an inclined plane, and a pulley system. Participants are exploring the dynamics of the system and the forces acting on the masses.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the masses, including gravitational and tension forces, and question the assumptions made regarding these forces. There are attempts to derive equations for maximum acceleration and to clarify the relationships between the masses and their accelerations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance to each other. Some have offered equations and insights into the relationships between the forces and accelerations, while others are seeking clarification on specific points and the implications of their equations.

Contextual Notes

There are references to the coefficients of friction and the conditions under which the system operates, such as the absence of slipping between the masses. Participants are also navigating the implications of Newton's Laws in their reasoning.

  • #31
haruspex said:
As you correctly stated in post #28, the forces that act on M are gravity and the tension. Those are the only forces that should appear in the equation. Yes, it may turn out that the tension is equal to ##(m_1+m_2)*g*\sin(16) ##, but take it one step at a time.
And think about the way each force acts on M.
T= ##(m_1+m_2)*g*\sin(16) ##
Gravity = M*g
Tension and Gravity are opposite forces. So we should consider the Gravity negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
mustafamistik said:
T= ##(m_1+m_2)*g*\sin(16) ##
Gravity = M*g
Tension and Gravity are opposite forces. So we should consider the Gravity negative?
It doesn't matter which direction you take as positive as long as you are consistent. The important point is that tension and gravity are acting in opposite directions
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mustafamistik
  • #33
PeroK said:
It doesn't matter which direction you take as positive as long as you are consistent. The important point is that tension and gravity are acting in opposite directions
I get it thanks sir. But i don't know how to calculate max M still.
 
  • #34
mustafamistik said:
I get it thanks sir. But i don't know how to calculate max M still.
Let's take a step back. If there is no slipping between ##m_1## and ##m_2##, then we have a simple pulley system with a mass ##M## pulling a mass ##m_1 + m_2## up a slope.

Can you calculate the acceleration of the system?
 
  • #35
Using ##F=m*a##;
##M*g-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)*g/(M+m_1+m_2)=a##
 
  • #36
mustafamistik said:
Using ##F=m*a##;
##M*g-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)*g/(M+m_1+m_2)=a##
You might need to tidy that up a bit. And check you aren't missing some brackets.

What does that tell you about the acceleration of ##m_1##?
 
  • #37
PeroK said:
You might need to tidy that up a bit. And check you aren't missing some brackets.

What does that tell you about the acceleration of ##m_1##?
You are right.
##(M*g-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)*g)/(M+m_1+m_2)=a##
=> ##(g*(M-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)))##
a is acceleration of the all system.
 
  • #38
mustafamistik said:
You are right.
##(M*g-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)*g)/(M+m_1+m_2)=a##
=> ##(g*(M-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)))##
a is acceleration of the all system.
And there's an upper limit on ##a##, correct? Depending on ##\mu##?
 
  • #39
PeroK said:
And there's an upper limit on ##a##, correct? Depending on ##\mu##?
This is the point where I stuck.
 
  • #40
mustafamistik said:
This is the point where I stuck.
I don't know what you mean. You did that already:

mustafamistik said:
This equation to find maximum acceleration. (m2*g*cos(16)* μ) -(m2*g*sin(16))=m2*a (F=ma)

Maybe it was so long ago!
 
  • #41
PeroK said:
I don't know what you mean. You did that already:
Maybe it was so long ago!
Is that equation true ?
 
  • #42
mustafamistik said:
Is that equation true ?
I think so. You just have to put everything together now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mustafamistik
  • #43
PeroK said:
I think so. You just have to put everything together now.
Thank you and @haruspex for helping solve and understand this question. Also thanks for your interest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
356
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K