Nitrogen Ground State: 2s^2 2p^3 ^4 S_{3/2}

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the electronic state classification of nitrogen, particularly its ground and excited states. The ground state configuration for nitrogen is identified as 2s^2 2p^3, with the ground state term being ^4 S_{3/2}. The first two excited states are noted as ^2 D_{5/2, 3/2} and ^2 P_{3/2, 1/2}. There is a clarification regarding the relationship between excited states and angular momentum terms, emphasizing that excited states involve electrons moving to higher energy levels, such as from 2p to 3s, which does not directly correlate with angular momentum terms. The discussion also mentions that while certain energy levels may not appear in the absorption spectrum due to selection rules, they can be observed in the emission spectrum.
pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
I am looking over my notes for quantum mechanics, particularly for electronic state classification for nitrogen.
At ground state, nitrogen atom's 1s and 2s shells are fully filled and the 2p shell is half filled, thus the configuration is:
##2s^2 2p^3##
There are 3 different angular momentum terms:
##^4 S_{3/2}##, ##^2 D_{5/2, 3/2}##, ##^2 P_{3/2, 1/2}##

In my notes it says that the ground state is at ##^4 S_{3/2}##
and the first 2 excited states are at ##^2 D_{5/2, 3/2}##, ##^2 P_{3/2, 1/2}##.

I am confused. I thought excited states don't have anything to do with the angular momentum terms, but instead, it only has to do with the configuration. My understanding for excited state is that one of the electrons from the 2p subshell occupies a higher state. So wouldn't that make ##2s^2 2p^2 3s## the first excited electronic state?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The ground electronic configuration can have different energy levels. In a regular absorption spectrum, however, you will not see lines corresponding to those levels, as the selection rule ##\Delta l = \pm1## is not satisfied. The lowest energy absorption transition will be to the 2p23s, as you correctly noted.

Nevertheless, the ##^2 D_{5/2, 3/2}##, and ##^2 P_{3/2, 1/2}## levels are there, and may be observed in the emission spectrum.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...

Similar threads

Back
Top