Noether's Theorem and the real world

AI Thread Summary
Noether's theorem is rooted in the symmetries of physical laws, specifically the invariance of the action in the Lagrangian framework. While the real-world distribution of galaxies and materials is inhomogeneous, this does not invalidate the theorem, as symmetries do not require uniformity in matter distribution. Conservation laws such as energy, momentum, and angular momentum may not hold precisely in all scenarios, but the underlying principles of Noether's theorem remain relevant. The discussion emphasizes that boundary conditions can be incorporated later in the analysis. Overall, Noether's theorem continues to provide a foundational understanding of symmetries in physics despite real-world complexities.
sweet springs
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
75
Hi.

Noether's theorem comes from the symmetries of the world. In the real world the distribution of galaxies and materials are inhomogeneous. Noether's theorem does not stand for the real world, so conxervations of energy, momentum, angular momentum do not stand exactly. Is it OK? Thanks in advance for your teachings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sweet springs said:
In the real world the distribution of galaxies and materials are inhomogeneous.

This does not matter. The matter distribution does not need to be invariant under the transformation for it to be a symmetry, Noether's theorem relates to the invariance of the action.
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens and Noctisdark
sweet springs said:
Noether's theorem comes from the symmetries of the world
Noether's theorem comes from the symmetries of the Lagrangian. In other words, the symmetries of the laws of physics.

The boundary conditions are added later.
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens
Thanks a lot!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top