Noether's theorem -- Time inversion

AI Thread Summary
Noether's theorem establishes a connection between symmetries and conservation laws, specifically linking time homogeneity to the conservation of energy. The discussion highlights confusion regarding time inversion symmetry and its relationship to time translation symmetry. It clarifies that time reversal symmetry (t → -t) is distinct from time translation symmetry, as demonstrated by the example of the cosine function. The cosine function exhibits symmetry under time reversal but does not maintain symmetry under time translations. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the implications of Noether's theorem in physics.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Noether's theorem said that because of homogeneity in time the law of conservation of energy exists. I am bit of confused and I am not sure is also time inversion some consequence of this. For example in the case of free fall we have symmetry ## t \rightarrow -t##. I am sometimes confused of that. Symmetry ## t \rightarrow -t##. is valid when we have conservation of energy and conservation of energy we have because of homogeneity in time. Could please give me some more insight on this problem. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Noether's theorem applies to differential symmetries like time translation, and not to discrete symmetries like time reversal.
 
Yes but we will not have time reversal symmetry if we did not have symmetry under the time translations. Right?
 
Also when we have ## t \rightarrow -t## didn't we did translation of time ##t## of some kind?
 
No. Consider the function ##\cos (t)##. It is symmetric under time reversal ##\cos(t)=\cos(-t)## but not time translations ##\cos(t)\ne \cos(t+\delta t)##
 
DaleSpam said:
No. Consider the function ##\cos (t)##. It is symmetric under time reversal but not time translations.
Thanks Sir. Very nice example.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top