Non-consecutive forces and work energy theorem

AI Thread Summary
A dockworker's problem involves a 350-N crate sliding down an 8 m incline to a ship's deck 5 m below, facing a 50 N frictional force. The discussion highlights the importance of using the work-energy theorem to calculate the crate's final speed and the coefficient of friction, despite initial confusion over missing angle information. Key corrections were made regarding potential energy calculations and the work done by friction. Ultimately, the correct final speed was determined to be 8.69 m/s, and the coefficient of friction was found to be 0.183. The problem was successfully solved with guidance from forum participants.
BrainMan
Messages
279
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A dockworker allows a 350-N crate to slide down an incline that is 8 m in length to the deck of a ship 5 m below the dock level. The rough incline exerts a frictional force of 50 N on the crate. (a) What is the speed of the crate as it reaches the deck (b) What is the coefficient of friction between the incline and the crate?


Homework Equations


Wnc= (KEf-Kei)+ (PEf-PEi)

E= KE+PE




The Attempt at a Solution


I am having trouble with this problem because it does not include θ which means I can't find the initial potential energy. I also don't have the velocity at any point so I don't know the kinetic energy either. I can't substitute to find the answer because I have more unknowns than equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need the potential energy but the change in PE. You don't need the angle for this.
You can calculate the work associated with friction. The only unknown is the final Ke.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The problem gives the length of the incline and also states that the deck is 5 meters below the dock. What do you need the angle for?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
If you were solving this problem via force diagrams, you COULD calculate the angle, given that the height is 5m and length of the incline is 8m (think Pythagorean theorem). But really, since you're using work / energy, you don't need to go this route.

You need to factor in the friction force into your energy equation. Think of the work done by the dissipative force and how it is related to the change in thermal energy. You should've learned the proper equations to figure it out.
 
OK what I have tried now is to find the velocity based on the equation for the work of the non consecutive forces. I found the initial potential energy by using mgy so
350(9.8)(5)= 17150.
Then I plugged this into the nonconsecutive force formula Wnc= KEf-PEi. So
-50= 1/2mv^2- 17150
v= 9.89 m/s
It says the answer is actually 8.69 m/s
what am I doing wrong?
 
Your PE is not right.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
BrainMan said:
OK what I have tried now is to find the velocity based on the equation for the work of the non consecutive forces. I found the initial potential energy by using mgy so
350(9.8)(5)= 17150.
Then I plugged this into the nonconsecutive force formula Wnc= KEf-PEi. So
-50= 1/2mv^2- 17150
v= 9.89 m/s
It says the answer is actually 8.69 m/s
what am I doing wrong?

Two things wrong:
1) As another poster noted, the PE is incorrect. Note that the problem says the crate is 350 Newtons, not 350 kg.
2) Wnc is not just -50N. There's something missing there. Remember the general equation for Work and check your units.
 
OK I have figured out how to find the velocity. Now I am having trouble finding the coefficient of friction. The formula for the coefficient of friction is force of friction/normal force= coefficient. I did this and got .142 and the answer is .183. I also tried to find the normal force by doing 350 cos θ but theta is not included in this problem. What do I do?
 
BrainMan said:
OK I have figured out how to find the velocity. Now I am having trouble finding the coefficient of friction. The formula for the coefficient of friction is force of friction/normal force= coefficient. I did this and got .142 and the answer is .183. I also tried to find the normal force by doing 350 cos θ but theta is not included in this problem. What do I do?

You have sufficient information to figure out ##\theta##. Refer to a previous post that gave you all the hint you should need.
 
  • #10
I understand the problem now and have gotten both parts of the problem right! Thanks for all the help!
 
Back
Top