Non-Inertial FRs in GR: Summary & Sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter GarageDweller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames Gr
GarageDweller
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Bit confused regarding how non-inertial frames can be treated in GR (and by non-inertial i mean affected by some kind of four-force). Can anyone give a brief summary or link to some good sources?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They have the exact same formulation as in SR. So for starters have you seen how non-inertial frames are treated in SR?

If not then read chapter 3 of the following notes: http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/fys/FYS4160/v06/undervisningsmateriale/kompendium.pdf

If you have springer access through your university then there is no better reference you could possibly hope for than the following text: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-37276-6

For GR see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_fields_in_general_relativity

Could you at least specify what exactly is confusing you about non-inertial frames in GR?
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top