Non uniform circular motion acceleration

AI Thread Summary
In non-uniform circular motion, the centripetal acceleration does change as the velocity of the object varies. The equation A = v²/r applies to uniform circular motion, but in non-uniform motion, the velocity is not constant, leading to variations in acceleration. The Frenet equations provide a more comprehensive framework for analyzing motion in two dimensions, including cases of non-uniform circular motion. If the object remains on the same circular path with radius r, the centripetal acceleration will indeed increase as velocity increases. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately describing non-uniform circular motion.
ahmed emad
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
In uniform curved motion , I can get the acceleration from the equation :
A = v2/r , but in non uniform the velocity is changing , so will the certipetal acceleration also change ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google the Frenet equations. Those equations treat the more general case.
 
It's far from my question. I meant will the centripetal acceleration increase?
 
ahmed emad said:
It's far from my question. I meant will the centripetal acceleration increase?
If the object stays on the same circle of radius ## r ##, the answer is yes.
 
Okay , thanks very much.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top