Nonrelativistic Limit Homework: Problem 6.2 - 1st Step

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


http://books.google.com/books?id=Xm...42EpgKaxsi5Dw&sig=6cUrZKqmPMoe0QBRTSYNnipNRw4
For problem 6.2, in the expression x = a sigma/ sigma_1, sigma is the spatial parameter but what is sigma_1 and is a the x-coordinate of one endpoint of the string?

Also, can someone give the first step I should take in order to solve this problem?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
does my question make sense to people?
 
ehrenfest said:

Homework Statement


http://books.google.com/books?id=Xm...42EpgKaxsi5Dw&sig=6cUrZKqmPMoe0QBRTSYNnipNRw4
For problem 6.2, in the expression x = a sigma/ sigma_1, sigma is the spatial parameter but what is sigma_1 and is a the x-coordinate of one endpoint of the string?

Also, can someone give the first step I should take in order to solve this problem?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


zwiebach uses the somewhat confusing notation that for an open string, sigma ranges from 0 to \sigma_1 so \sigma_1 is indeed the coordinate corresponding to the extremity of the string. Therefore x ranges from 0 to a (so a is the length of the string).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top