• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Nonsinusodial wave function problem

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
I am having a problem with an example problem in my physics book. The example goes like so:

a.)Show that
[tex]\psi(x) = Ax + B[/tex]
[tex] A, B, constant [/tex]
is a solution of the Schrodinger equation for an E = 0 energy level of a particle in a box. b.) what constraints do the boundary conditions at x = 0 and x = L place on the constants A and B?


2. Relevant equations
[tex]\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}\psi(x)}{dx^{2}}= E\psi(x)[/tex]


3. The attempt at a solution
Part a i understand completely -- i just take the second derivative of the wave function and find its eigenvalue to be 0, which corresponds to the energy. However, for part b, I am not quite understanding how the book applies the boundary conditions. They claim the following:

"applying the boundary condition:
[tex] x = 0[/tex]
[tex]\psi(0) = A = 0[/tex]
so,
[tex] A = 0, and \psi(x) = Bx[/tex].
Then applying the boundary condition:
[tex] x = L[/tex]
gives [tex] \psi(L) = BL = 0[/tex]
so B must be zero. How are they finding this for the IVP? If i plug zero into the wave function i get B = 0, not A = 0. I must be missing something. Could someone please tell me what I'm not seeing? Thank you!
 

cepheid

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,183
35
Agreed. If psi is zero at x = 0, then there no constant term (the linear wavefunction starts at the origin). ==> B = 0.

The other boundary condition would give you AL = 0. ==> A = 0.

So, the wavefunction is identically zero. Which means that there is no chance of a particle being in the box. So what was the point of this problem exactly???

Edit: By this, what I mean is that, isn't this the TRIVIAL solution to the eigenvalue equation? If there is no particle in the box, the energy of the system is zero (inside the box).

Edit 2: In fact, I thought that a zero eigenfunction was not allowed as a valid solution to the eigenvalue equation, because it would have infinitely many possible eigenvalues.
 
Last edited:
The problem was intented to be trivial i think to show that you cant have a valid wave function of this form since you would get zero probability of finding your particle anywhere. But, im glad that you also get AL = 0 and B = 0 instead of A = 0 and BL = 0 (they lead to the same thing but them getting it in that form is somewhat bothersome for me because I feel like i'm missing somehing). Thank you for the help!
 

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top