Nonuniformly charged semicircle

  • Thread starter Thread starter pittmed80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charged
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total charge of a non-uniformly charged semicircle with a radius of 18.5 cm and a charge density defined by λ = -4.42θ. The initial calculation for total charge, Q, was incorrectly derived using the formula Q = (lambda)*L. A correction was suggested, indicating that the differential charge dQ should be expressed as dQ = λ*ds, where ds = R*dθ. The integration of this corrected expression from 0 to π yields the accurate total charge. The final approach clarifies the integration process needed to find the correct charge value.
pittmed80
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A non-uniformly charged semicircle of radius R=18.5 cm lies in the xy plane, centered at the origin, as shown. The charge density varies as the angle θ (in radians) according to λ = − 4.42 θ, where λ has units of μC/m.What is the total charge on the semicircle?



2. Homework Equations : Q=(lambda)/L, L=(theta)*radius


I calculate Q to be (lambda)*L, or Q=(-4.42*(theta))*(.185*(theta)). I then ran this over the integral from theta=zero to theta=(pi). I got an answer in micro-Coulombs so I converted it to Coulombs to answer. I ended up with -8.4513E10^-6, but it says that It's incorrect...help??! due at 11 tonight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pittmed80 said:
A non-uniformly charged semicircle of radius R=18.5 cm lies in the xy plane, centered at the origin, as shown. The charge density varies as the angle θ (in radians) according to λ = − 4.42 θ, where λ has units of μC/m.What is the total charge on the semicircle?



2. Homework Equations : Q=(lambda)/L, L=(theta)*radius


I calculate Q to be (lambda)*L, or Q=(-4.42*(theta))*(.185*(theta)). I then ran this over the integral from theta=zero to theta=(pi). I got an answer in micro-Coulombs so I converted it to Coulombs to answer. I ended up with -8.4513E10^-6, but it says that It's incorrect...help??! due at 11 tonight!



You know that a very small section of the charge would be dQ. You also know that the charge Q = (lamda)*s (this was wrong under your relevant equations (the arc length of that segment)). So... dQ = (lamda)*ds using some basic trig and what not you know that ds = r*d(theta) so then you get...


dQ = lamda*R*dTHETA and you're give your value of lambda so sub that in and you get...


dQ = -4.42(Theta)*R*d(theta) so integrate with respect to theta from 0 to pi b/c it's a semi-circle so you get...


Q = -4.42*R[ integral from 0 to pit of (theta d theta) ]

or

q = -4.42*R*(theta)^2/2 from 0 to pi...


Hope this helps :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top